Bob Atchison Forgery...

Updated!

ONE OF MANY EXAMPLES OF FORGERY COMMITTED BY BOB ATCHISON

The definition of "Forgery", in criminal law is the willful fabrication or alteration of a written document with the intent to injure the interests of another in a fraudulent manner. Typical examples of forgery are making insertions or alterations in otherwise valid documents and appending another's signature to a document without permission. In the United States forgery ordinarily is a state crime; but to send forged documents through the post office may constitute the federal crime of mail fraud.

Bob Atchison represented to the court and law enforcement the above document represented a true copy of the invoice sent to Enigma Films, it was not. Oma Hamou testified at trial that the e-mails which appear underneath the “alleged” invoice were altered and/or she did not create.

This is a true representation of the the document sent to Enigma by Pallasart on July 13, 2000

ONE YEAR LATER

Having been recently hospitalized with a severe upper respiratory illness Oma Hamou was forced to represent herself because the court had denied her Motion for a continuance. http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/Plaintiff_s_Reurged_Motion_for_Continuance.pdf

Excerpt from Oma Hamou's affidavit (6):

"...Prior to, and after being in the hospital, per the instructions by the treating physician at the local hospital, I spent a majority of my time in bed. (See Exhibit A) When the court denied both my then counsel, Mr. Boyce Brown Reid of the law firm of George & Brothers, LLP and my Motion for a continuance filed in pro se I was suddenly forced in one day to attempt to prepare an adequate defense. To better illustrate the sense of panic I felt on the morning of the 27th, not only was I ill with a high temperature but we had Voir Dire, which is creating the jury, and by noon we were ready to start trial. I had less than one hour to ‘literally’ run back to my hotel, pull exhibits together and have exhibit boards prepared all by the time court resumed that afternoon..."

At trial both Bob Atchison and his attorney testified the above invoices identified as "Pallasart" were invoices for a previous debt belonging to Ms. Hamou's company, Enigma which resulted in a lawsuit.

Quote Bob Atchison’s Attorney Matthews: "...There was a prior suit between these two people in California and then there was another prior suit in Texas. The one in California that Ms. Hamou filed was dismissed. The prior lawsuit here in Texas was settled, and that had to do with Mr. Atchison’s former business partner and the web design company that they own together. That matter was resolved and that suit was dismissed..."

According to the State of Texas other than the then present lawsuit case No. GN303141 between Atchison and Hamou no other lawsuit existed between the two.

Excerpt from Oma Hamou's Affidavit:

17. During trial, I wanted to enter into evidence documents which supported my testimony that this alleged debt, “if at all” legitimate, didn’t belong to Mr. Atchison as an individual but to his web design company, Pallasart. Secondly, that the documents would also support the fact that Mr. Atchison had attempted to extort additional money from me by removing my company’s Internet page and replacing it with a page containing my home address. Despite my assertions to the contrary, both Mr. Atchison and his attorney stated the “alleged” debt owing to Mr. Atchison was not connected to Mr. Atchison’s web design company, Pallasart. They further asserted that in 2001 a lawsuit had been filed involving my motion picture company, Enigma Films, and Pallasart; and that this dispute had been settled.

18. I objected strongly to this representation made by both Mr. Atchison and his attorney because it was “pure fiction…a totally made up lie.” I informed the court that indeed this was a lie, which could easily be verified by a telephone call to the Travis County District Clerk’s office. Instead the court relied upon the representations made by Mr. Atchison and his attorney.

30. On or about September 10, 2001, Mr. Atchison despite having been paid in full for a 10 page web-design and services, acting as CEO of Pallasart, removed my web site and replaced it with a blank page which listed my home address. He did this because I refused to pay him on Invoice 2000-343 (See Exhibit E). In a letter to Mr. Atchison dated the same date of September 10, 2001, I expressed a great deal of hostility, frustration and disappointment towards the fact that my home address was suddenly posted on the web. I apologize to this court for the offensive language expressed in my letter to Mr. Atchison.

31. After several heated faxes, telephone calls and emails exchanged from both Pallasart and my office for the sake of my family’s emotional and physical well being, I agreed to settle Invoice #2000-343 for $5,000.00.

32. Both Mr. Atchison and his attorney have tried to pass off Pallasart’s “Settlement Invoice” #2000-580 as being some other dispute owing to Pallasart by Enigma. Mr. Atchison “personally” knew that this statement was false yet under oath he said this. As evidenced by Mr. Edward’s letter to me dated on September 10, 2001 the only outstanding invoice owing to Pallasart was Invoice # 2000-561 for web hosting services. Enigma did not contract additional services with Pallasart.

33. The “settlement” Invoice 2000-580, dated 9/10/2001, which more accurately would be described as extortion, was that Pallasart agreed it would remove my home address from the web for the price of $5,000. Far from the “settlement” of a legitimate invoice this was an act of extortion. I agreed to the terms. This was not for any service rendered; it was in exchange for removing a threat to my safety and the safety of my family. One of many unbelievable moments of this trial was when Mr. Atchison tried to pass this “extortion invoice” as being a settlement of some debt that Enigma owed Pallasart. I continue to be shocked by the distortions and lies perpetrated on me by this man and his company and by the fact he has, so far, gotten away with it.

Enigma Contracted Bob Atchison's Company, Pallasart to design a 10 page website which it"alleges" it did not receive.

The Amex Statement reflect payment was received on behalf of Enigma for the purchase of the "Kuchumov Photographs" yet reading the trial transcripts Bob Atchison testify he had not provided Oma Hamou the photographs nor had he returned Enigma's script.

The court records indicate not only did Pallasart receive payment in full for the design of a web site as well as the "Kuchumov Photographs" but web hosting services which Pallasart provided to Enigma.

On November 28, 2000 according to the above Invoice Pallasart faxed to Enigma reflects payment for Web Hosting Services.

According to the Amex statement Pallasart was paid $4, 540.00 yet on August 30, 2001 it attempted to defraud Enigma out of an additional funds. According to court documents Pallasart's contract with Enigma's states for $50 per month it would provide web hosting services. Court records also reveal that Bob Atchison contacted financial institutions and told them not to trust Oma Hamou as Enigma had no film project and Ms. Hamou was a fugitive. His statements were proven to be false and/or misleading.

AN INTERESTING LETTER....