Oma Hamou Reality Blog

On AA Legends another history forum about Anna Anderson & the Grand Duchess Anastasia Romanov, Rob Moshein published a statement he knew the author of the OmaHamouReality blog. He went on to say if Hamou wanted it deleted (gone) then all she had to do was have me (Sandman) delete mine.

I and others from the Legends forum decided to start this blog in part because Rob and his friends hijacked our forum and turned it into a place where they could daily stalk and harass Hamou and those who defended her.

I laugh when I read on that other blog (OmaHamouReality) that the author does not know Bob/Rob or Pallasart and is not in contact or associated with this group of people...yet Moshein himself told us he was.

Since Hamou's forum is offline and Legends is "no more" Mike Newson and other Hamou defenders have taken to make comments on the Alexander Palace Obsession blog about recent updates made on Oma Hamou Reality blog.

This is what Newson wrote today:

Justin (and everyone else that this applies to)

It matters not who the person(s) is who is/are publishing that Hate-Oma, and those around her, blog. The point is that they have been notified that their blog is libelous and that it is causing harm. Oma and I have both published letters correcting their inaccuracies and formally requested them to cease and desist. They will simply join in the group of other Hate-Oma defendants when this does go back to court. As financial loss is involved they will along with Bob Atchison / Pallasart, et. al. enjoy the court’s attention and suffer the same judgment and punishment, so why worry about who it is, as when the time is ripe all will be revealed.

I know the emotional trauma that you have undergone as well as the financial that we have all suffered because of what Bob did and what he has caused others to do. The Yin and Yang of the universe will eventually have to balance. So for right now I don’t worry about who they are. But as for their diatribes against Oma, and us (as there does seem to be this undercurrent of any one who defends Oma must be Oma…) are the same as in the past, why even give them the credence of reacting to them.

I have previoulsy taken the time to point by point take apart and debunk each and every point that Rob/Bob/Pallasart as well as the publishers of the current Hate-Oma Blog have published about Oma and myself. Rob/Bob both at one point were willing to say in print that everything they said about Oma was false and retract what they had said.

So I see no need to do that again, the point is that all of these people have been put on notice that their activities are causing harm: emotionally, physically, financially… Both Oma and I now have to point out daily that we have stalkers, so jobs are hard to come by, and we are forced almost daily defend ourselves to total strangers from these accusation.

Now as to the publishers of the current Hate-Oma-Group Blog continued decrying that they are not Rob or Bob or connected to or communicating with them, well if you (the reader) are serious then do some comparison of writing styles and words used such as; “kiddies”, “Miss Wannabee Never Was Thang”, notice especially the “Thang” word. Or their decleration of “We are NOT "Pallasart". We are NOT any single person they say we are. We are NOT in contact with nor in any way affiliated with any of them either.” Now compare that with the OmaHamouReports decleration of “This website is the private property of the author/domain owner, and was researched, written and built by no one else. Despite Hamou's claims, Robert Atchison has no involvment whatsoever with this content.” And yet in Bob’s communications with the police he claimed ownership of the site content. Also notice that on Legends that Rob admitted that he knew the author as he could get the Hate-Oma Blog taken down, and now they say they have no contact with Rob/Bob/Pallasart… Next notice that they published eMail’s that had not been published previously, and as “we” certainly did not provide them with the letterthat the question comes up in --- how did they get it?

I asked Oma about this and she replied:

Mike,

The letters which you or Justin have put up on the web have either been published on the web from the onset of my litigation with Bob/Rob with my then attorney's knowledge and/or were made a part of the official court record in pleadings by my then attorney. No one has published Patricia's letter to you which she forwarded to Rob and its unlikely that the person who created the blog about me paid hundreds of dollars to obtain the court record. With that in mind, I think the court would have a record of who came and got a copy of the file or parts thereof?

Oma

I’ll leave it to the reader to make up their own minds as to if the material published by Watchtower on those Blogs is harmful to Oma, myself, or anyone associated with Oma. It is instructive to look at the concept of “motive.” What motive does the publisher of those blogs have? Why would they keep doing what they do, why spend time reading what Sandman compiles from the Web, and then responding to things about Rob/Bob/Pallasart????? What is the motive? Why do they hate Oma and all associated with her?

Why do they ask the exact same questions? Why is there the similarity of words as used in the past (kiddies and Thang?) Why are the writing styles similar? Why do they say the exact same things as have been previously published and defacto admitted to by Rob/Bob as false and misleading by their willingness to negotiate a retraction with Oma’s Lawyer, and yet in spite of that and the knowledge that the courts did not find what they had published to be innocuous they resumed their destructive behaviors?

Taken one point at a time it means nothing, but statically, based on the overwhelming similarities, the concept that the present authors have no connections at all with the previous authors that have held up the Hate-Oma-Group banner is honestly ludicrous.

Bottom line is --- Why?

What is their motivation?