Rob Moshein Who Dubs Himself as The Austin Wine Guy...

How is it that Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein can rise to such heights of artistic creation, moral goodness and personal self-sacrifice, and yet sink to such depths of depravity, moral cruelty and self-centredness?

http://www.omahamou.info/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=57&p=2104&sid=82f32b256f508f6d869fd258c18460b5

Lacking Research Skills Rob Moshein & Bob Atchison The Men Who Created and Operate a web site called the Alexander Palace Time Machine

Edited.

Over the course of 4 years this issue has been by both the State of Utah and Oma Hamou but let's take a look at the latest post on Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison's Oma Hamou Reality Blog headlines scream: "One Major Piece of Da Reality Uncovered" in that Hamou has 3 felony convictions in the state of Utah. Perhaps the truth is the men who by profession are a historian and an attorney are simply lacking research skills?

Typical research weaknesses seem to include these:

• Reinventing the wheel > lack of awareness of what has been done before. Suggests poor ability to synthesize previous research, lack of critical reading, perhaps poor library skills or perhaps these men are angry because Hamou has exposed the lies told by Bob Atchison while he was under oath?

Throughout the years Oma Hamou has maintained: "...there is only ONE Utah Conviction. There is not a second conviction from the State of Utah against me. For those of you who still believe that I do have 2 Felony convictions in the State of Utah, please feel free to contact the Park County District Clerk of Court's office concerning my conviction at 435-615-4300..."

On her own blog (OmaHamou.com) she states the error was not her fault but the law firm of her then attorney who simply put the number 3 beside of the State Utah.

According to Mike Newson the District Clerk's office has been notified of Hamou's stalkers who continue to libel her by publishing on the web she has three felony convictions in that State. They are not happy to hear about this. In the State of Utah it is actually one conviction as both numbers provided on these various reports contain the case number "1338"- anyone in criminal law will tell you that it is the same case. Call the courts in Utah and ask them how many convictions do they show for Oma and ask them if it was for writing a bad check and verify the old case number 911313381 if it was converted during district / circuit data merge.The phone number for the Summit County District Clerk of Court's office is 435-615-4300.

The bottom line is that when I look at the evidence that was presented on Rob/Bob's hate Oma site, and is now found in Bob's own evidence to the Texas courts. I find that the evidence supports the conclusion that Oma Hamou had three different convictions, one each from Utah, Wyoming, and Montana, all of which were transferred to Montana for finial disposition. We know that one case in Montana was from Utah, as Bob Atchison's evidence gives us the Utah case number 1338, which is also stated in the Montana record. The Montana conviction we know about because it says Yellowstone as the county the offense happened in. As to the Wyoming one, we know that there was an offense in Wyoming, because Oma Hamou said that was where it happened, and I have called the courts there to verify it.

How ever all that matters at this point is that we know it did not happen in Montana as the record specifically says, "Other State." We know that in all cases the sentence was suspended, and thus no prison time, so she could never have been on parole as Bob Atchison & Rob Moshein have said in the past. And that she made restitution as the court records state this, and that probation was rescinded, as she had made restitution and paid the price for her actions so many, many years ago - 16 to be exact!

When one continues to find error in Bob Atchison & Rob Moshein's research on so many points one has to feel that these errors are intentional. That they ignored the facts, and continue to deny that they have made mistakes in spite of their knowledge that they have made these mistakes --- as plenty of people have told them they have errors, including law enforcement officials, and we are aware of the many times that they have visited Oma Hamou's site where this was first published, and where it has many times hosted posts that refuted their conclusions, one has to wonder about their intent to see truth dispensed or if their intent is to bring humiliation and harm to Oma. Then there is the point of people who are "inside" Bob's circle (who are willing to testify) and who know that he has been told that his story is full of lies, and yet Bob/Rob continue to publish the lies.

Again, when you look at the complete Utah records you will find the case number 1338. All the records associated with Utah have this case number, however prior to 11-04-97 the case number was 911313381 this was then converted during district / circuit data merge to 1338.

The Utah District Court:

11-12-96 Note: ON MOTION OF DEFENDANT, STATE'S COUNSEL & COURT AGREEING, COURT GRANTS DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DEEM RESTITUTION AS PAID;

11-12-96 Note: COURT ALSO TERMINATES HER FROM PROBATION AND WISHES HER SUCCESS
11-12-96 Note: Entered case disposition of: Closed11-14-96 Note: Case disposition removed
11-04-97 Note: Old case number 911313381 converted during district / circuit data merge.

The heart of the issue here does involve propaganda and many of its techniques, such as the Big Lie, and Red Herrings, which is why I have been talking about them so that those who read about this skirmish will understand why each side has said what they have. There is a dance of words going on as that is the battle field in this war. Things like asking a question of one person and then switching in the middle to another person. So that if the person the question was asked of responded to the question, that it could be taken that someone else said that, again a simple propaganda technique. The ultimate question may simply come down to; is what Oma Hamou claims supportable by documentation, acceptable in court, such that she can support her position. Versus, is what Rob Moshein & Bob Atchison said/published as "fact" about Oma Hamou supportable as truth, in court. There seems to be an attitude of you can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs in the "other" camp, not to mention the attitude of "the ends justify the means."

Source: http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/search?q=the+sins+of+oma+hamou

As a sidenote to Moshein's latest posting about him not being the person who created the blog Oma Hamou Reality. In 2006 when Atchison, Moshein and the Gang of the AP crowd hijacked my friend's history forum and used it as a place to stalk, defame, libel, harass and humilate Oma Hamou, Rob Moshein admitted in pm's and on the AP forum in pm's he created the blog. Thus, Oma Hamou knows Rob created the blog because he said he did and law enforcement believes Moshein is telling the truth.

Scurrilous Outright Lies & Propaganda

Rob Moshein's recent publication of the abuse Oma Hamou suffered at the hands of her ex-husband Marcus Demian was something she made up to make us all feel sorry for her despite the overwhelming court documentation from Montana and California. This is another attempt to smear, disparage, and defame Hamou's reputation and others with the grossest and basest of outright lies and propaganda. Notice how Moshein doesn't deny publicly he created the blog Oma Hamou Reality.

For additional Information about Marcus Demian
http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2007_07_01_archive.html#4623304696439523420

Bob Atchison The Pathological Liar?

Yesterday Justin Edwards posted on OmaHamou.com


Today the Gang from the AP admitted at least some of them are men hiding behind women’s name on Rob Moshein's Blog to harass, intimidate and with malice torment my friend Oma Hamou.

As a friend of hers I would like to say something in part about the incident involving a woman name Helen Azar. I’m not sure of all the details regarding Allison and Helen’s friendship, but I do know it did exist and in 2005 Oma ended up paying for Helen’s trip to Russia. This included all of Helen’s living and miscellaneous expenses to the tune of around $4,900 during this time Oma was in the midst of having to go to trial with Bob Atchison and changing attorneys. She spent thousands of dollars living for several months in a four star hotel while in Austin she got pneumonia ended up in the hospital (Mike traveled down there to help out) and was being represented by an attorney name Mr. Brown. My friend was very generous with Helen Azar yet Bob and his Gang grossly exaggerate Helen and Allison’s friendship that friendship is their business and has nothing to do with Oma other than the fact that it was because of Allison she met Helen.

As to the men who pretend to be attorneys especially Hedley whatever his name is, well Martindale.com says he is not an attorney and well, I suspect he is Mike Pyles and I suspect all of the posters on Rob's blog are from Pallasart's Alexander Palace Time Machine Forum. This "Hedley" person claims every member on Oma’s forum comes from one IP – so let me play the devil’s advocate what if what he says is right that would mean someone hacked into Oma’s forum and got the information. Isn't hacking into other people's computers a crime?

I am not Oma, Mike is not Oma, Russophile is not Oma and Boris Romanov and Peter Kurth and everyone else who has registered and posted on Oma’s forum is not Oma. Some of the posters who have registered here we suspect are from the AP crowd, some of them admitted they were the point here is Bob Atchison, Rob Moshein and the AP Gang’s steadfast M.O. for 9 years has been anyone who defends Oma is her.

The comments on Rob’s blog are defamatory, libelous and are written to humiliate and intimidate Oma into believing that she doesn’t have a leg to stand on in any court room setting. They keep reminding the public that she has debt even bringing up debts from the early 80's and 90’s the acupuncture in Beverly Hills who sued Oma, the point they make is the public should not trust Oma nor should they believe her or any of us who defend her because she’s basically a loser, a mental reject, con artist and convicted felon.

Instead, They want you the public to believe that REAL COURT documents Bob Atchison and Pallasart (his tiny web design company) gave to the courts in Texas, that there was nothing wrong with these documents. That’s a bald face lie. Bob Atchison under a court order and oath was ordered to produce ALL documents so was his web design company in the course of the Discovery phase of the litigation between Oma and Them. He and Pallasart swore under oath that THEY had provided ALL documents yet we on Oma’s Team knew this was a lie.

For example the Exhibit marked as Plaitiff’s (Atchison) Exhibit C was not a copy of the original invoice given to Oma’s company Enigma by Pallasart and I posted the REAL INVOICE WITH PALLASART'S FAX NUMBER APPEARING AT THE TOP OF THE INVOICE. Bob & his attorney by way of the trial transcript which I’ve posted say another lawsuit in Texas had been filed against Oma’s company and his company this is not true and we’ve shown this by way of posting a copy of the actual page of the trial transcript and the District Clerks Office down there in Texas that validates what Oma has said, no other lawsuit in Texas existed between her company and Bob.

We’ve been hearing Bob has been forwarding documents which have been forwarded to us showing that he’s not lying, well, how come Bob couldn’t produce those documents when the courts asked him too?

I think he made them up because no where in the original documents he provided and the two additional supplemental documents are those documents. So why in the hell didn’t he produce this document then because he was ordered by the court to do so and only now found them – could it be because they didn’t exist in the first place?

Bob Atchison represented to the court and law enforcement the above document represented a true copy of the invoice sent to Enigma Films, it was not. Oma Hamou testified at trial that the e-mails which appear underneath the “alleged” invoice were altered and/or she did not create.

This is a true representation of the the document sent to Enigma from Atchison's, Pallasart Web Venture's on July 13, 2000 a document Pallasart deliberately WITHHELD because IT was protecting its CEO/FOUNDER/PRESIDENT Bob Atchison.

ONE YEAR BEFORE

Both Bob Atchison and his Then Attorney committed perjury at trial during his lawsuit with Oma Hamou let's read what Bob Atchison's then Attorney had to say to the court:





According to the State of Texas other than the then present lawsuit case No. GN303141between Atchison and Hamou no other lawsuit existed between the two.

BOB ATCHISON WON HIS LAWSUIT AGAINST OMA HAMOU BY COMMITTING THE CRIME OF PERJURY AND FORGERY TO NAME BUT A FEW. THERE IS NOTHING HONORABLE ABOUT THAT. WHO IS THE VICTIM BOB ATCHISON OR OMA HAMOU?


During the Trial in court transcripts real documents that a court reporter recorded Bob Atchison says under oath he was never involved in the California case where Oma sued him for defamation etc. well this is a lie because he filed pleadings in Pro Se and when the case got dismissed because the courts in California felt it didn't have the jurisdiction over Bob, Oma hired an attorney which then forced Bob to get someone to represent him.

So, Bob Atchison the man who created the Alexander Palace Time Machine web site lied more than one time under oath in a Texas court room yet those on Pallasart's Forum believe the man's actions against my friend were justified - NO it isn't.

A Judge in Texas in her own hand wrote that if a Protective Order wasn’t in place my friend would get hurt and she has because Rob has went on to republish the same words found on Pallasart’s Oma Hamou Report web site to a site that provides a link to Rob’s blogs and both Rob and Bob continue to lie about Oma. And their friends over on the AP site seem to think that Bob and Rob are telling the truth about Oma and she has no right to defend herself against their lies because she owes money and all the rest of the nonsense they’ve said about her.

Well they are wrong. A Judge, Judge Livingston is Texas told Pallasart and Rob Moshein THEY were wrong. Oma has every right to defend herself against these horrible lies and people. A brief is being prepared to be filed in Federal Court against Bob Atchison and Pallasart. Like Penny Wilson I have a temper and cuss a lot but that doesn’t mean I am Oma or that Oma does this, yet people who have never met Oma pretend they know she does cuss.


Men who hide behind women’s name as Rob did when he registered with Classmates.com as Tonya Hoochie and sent pm’s to Oma pretending he went to the same school, hiding behind a false identity just to terrorize, humiliate and torment my friend are not men but cowards.

Source: http://www.omahamou.info/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=52&p=2099&sid=aadafd181e1a30e7b706944b5787bc92#p2099