Bob Atchison The Pathological Liar?
Yesterday Justin Edwards posted on OmaHamou.com
Today the Gang from the AP admitted at least some of them are men hiding behind women’s name on Rob Moshein's Blog to harass, intimidate and with malice torment my friend Oma Hamou.
As a friend of hers I would like to say something in part about the incident involving a woman name Helen Azar. I’m not sure of all the details regarding Allison and Helen’s friendship, but I do know it did exist and in 2005 Oma ended up paying for Helen’s trip to Russia. This included all of Helen’s living and miscellaneous expenses to the tune of around $4,900 during this time Oma was in the midst of having to go to trial with Bob Atchison and changing attorneys. She spent thousands of dollars living for several months in a four star hotel while in Austin she got pneumonia ended up in the hospital (Mike traveled down there to help out) and was being represented by an attorney name Mr. Brown. My friend was very generous with Helen Azar yet Bob and his Gang grossly exaggerate Helen and Allison’s friendship that friendship is their business and has nothing to do with Oma other than the fact that it was because of Allison she met Helen.
As to the men who pretend to be attorneys especially Hedley whatever his name is, well Martindale.com says he is not an attorney and well, I suspect he is Mike Pyles and I suspect all of the posters on Rob's blog are from Pallasart's Alexander Palace Time Machine Forum. This "Hedley" person claims every member on Oma’s forum comes from one IP – so let me play the devil’s advocate what if what he says is right that would mean someone hacked into Oma’s forum and got the information. Isn't hacking into other people's computers a crime?
I am not Oma, Mike is not Oma, Russophile is not Oma and Boris Romanov and Peter Kurth and everyone else who has registered and posted on Oma’s forum is not Oma. Some of the posters who have registered here we suspect are from the AP crowd, some of them admitted they were the point here is Bob Atchison, Rob Moshein and the AP Gang’s steadfast M.O. for 9 years has been anyone who defends Oma is her.
The comments on Rob’s blog are defamatory, libelous and are written to humiliate and intimidate Oma into believing that she doesn’t have a leg to stand on in any court room setting. They keep reminding the public that she has debt even bringing up debts from the early 80's and 90’s the acupuncture in Beverly Hills who sued Oma, the point they make is the public should not trust Oma nor should they believe her or any of us who defend her because she’s basically a loser, a mental reject, con artist and convicted felon.
Instead, They want you the public to believe that REAL COURT documents Bob Atchison and Pallasart (his tiny web design company) gave to the courts in Texas, that there was nothing wrong with these documents. That’s a bald face lie. Bob Atchison under a court order and oath was ordered to produce ALL documents so was his web design company in the course of the Discovery phase of the litigation between Oma and Them. He and Pallasart swore under oath that THEY had provided ALL documents yet we on Oma’s Team knew this was a lie.
For example the Exhibit marked as Plaitiff’s (Atchison) Exhibit C was not a copy of the original invoice given to Oma’s company Enigma by Pallasart and I posted the REAL INVOICE WITH PALLASART'S FAX NUMBER APPEARING AT THE TOP OF THE INVOICE. Bob & his attorney by way of the trial transcript which I’ve posted say another lawsuit in Texas had been filed against Oma’s company and his company this is not true and we’ve shown this by way of posting a copy of the actual page of the trial transcript and the District Clerks Office down there in Texas that validates what Oma has said, no other lawsuit in Texas existed between her company and Bob.
We’ve been hearing Bob has been forwarding documents which have been forwarded to us showing that he’s not lying, well, how come Bob couldn’t produce those documents when the courts asked him too?
I think he made them up because no where in the original documents he provided and the two additional supplemental documents are those documents. So why in the hell didn’t he produce this document then because he was ordered by the court to do so and only now found them – could it be because they didn’t exist in the first place?
Bob Atchison represented to the court and law enforcement the above document represented a true copy of the invoice sent to Enigma Films, it was not. Oma Hamou testified at trial that the e-mails which appear underneath the “alleged” invoice were altered and/or she did not create.
This is a true representation of the the document sent to Enigma from Atchison's, Pallasart Web Venture's on July 13, 2000 a document Pallasart deliberately WITHHELD because IT was protecting its CEO/FOUNDER/PRESIDENT Bob Atchison.
ONE YEAR BEFORE
Both Bob Atchison and his Then Attorney committed perjury at trial during his lawsuit with Oma Hamou let's read what Bob Atchison's then Attorney had to say to the court:
According to the State of Texas other than the then present lawsuit case No. GN303141between Atchison and Hamou no other lawsuit existed between the two.
Well they are wrong. A Judge, Judge Livingston is Texas told Pallasart and Rob Moshein THEY were wrong. Oma has every right to defend herself against these horrible lies and people. A brief is being prepared to be filed in Federal Court against Bob Atchison and Pallasart. Like Penny Wilson I have a temper and cuss a lot but that doesn’t mean I am Oma or that Oma does this, yet people who have never met Oma pretend they know she does cuss.
Men who hide behind women’s name as Rob did when he registered with Classmates.com as Tonya Hoochie and sent pm’s to Oma pretending he went to the same school, hiding behind a false identity just to terrorize, humiliate and torment my friend are not men but cowards.
Source: http://www.omahamou.info/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=52&p=2099&sid=aadafd181e1a30e7b706944b5787bc92#p2099
Today the Gang from the AP admitted at least some of them are men hiding behind women’s name on Rob Moshein's Blog to harass, intimidate and with malice torment my friend Oma Hamou.
As a friend of hers I would like to say something in part about the incident involving a woman name Helen Azar. I’m not sure of all the details regarding Allison and Helen’s friendship, but I do know it did exist and in 2005 Oma ended up paying for Helen’s trip to Russia. This included all of Helen’s living and miscellaneous expenses to the tune of around $4,900 during this time Oma was in the midst of having to go to trial with Bob Atchison and changing attorneys. She spent thousands of dollars living for several months in a four star hotel while in Austin she got pneumonia ended up in the hospital (Mike traveled down there to help out) and was being represented by an attorney name Mr. Brown. My friend was very generous with Helen Azar yet Bob and his Gang grossly exaggerate Helen and Allison’s friendship that friendship is their business and has nothing to do with Oma other than the fact that it was because of Allison she met Helen.
As to the men who pretend to be attorneys especially Hedley whatever his name is, well Martindale.com says he is not an attorney and well, I suspect he is Mike Pyles and I suspect all of the posters on Rob's blog are from Pallasart's Alexander Palace Time Machine Forum. This "Hedley" person claims every member on Oma’s forum comes from one IP – so let me play the devil’s advocate what if what he says is right that would mean someone hacked into Oma’s forum and got the information. Isn't hacking into other people's computers a crime?
I am not Oma, Mike is not Oma, Russophile is not Oma and Boris Romanov and Peter Kurth and everyone else who has registered and posted on Oma’s forum is not Oma. Some of the posters who have registered here we suspect are from the AP crowd, some of them admitted they were the point here is Bob Atchison, Rob Moshein and the AP Gang’s steadfast M.O. for 9 years has been anyone who defends Oma is her.
The comments on Rob’s blog are defamatory, libelous and are written to humiliate and intimidate Oma into believing that she doesn’t have a leg to stand on in any court room setting. They keep reminding the public that she has debt even bringing up debts from the early 80's and 90’s the acupuncture in Beverly Hills who sued Oma, the point they make is the public should not trust Oma nor should they believe her or any of us who defend her because she’s basically a loser, a mental reject, con artist and convicted felon.
Instead, They want you the public to believe that REAL COURT documents Bob Atchison and Pallasart (his tiny web design company) gave to the courts in Texas, that there was nothing wrong with these documents. That’s a bald face lie. Bob Atchison under a court order and oath was ordered to produce ALL documents so was his web design company in the course of the Discovery phase of the litigation between Oma and Them. He and Pallasart swore under oath that THEY had provided ALL documents yet we on Oma’s Team knew this was a lie.
For example the Exhibit marked as Plaitiff’s (Atchison) Exhibit C was not a copy of the original invoice given to Oma’s company Enigma by Pallasart and I posted the REAL INVOICE WITH PALLASART'S FAX NUMBER APPEARING AT THE TOP OF THE INVOICE. Bob & his attorney by way of the trial transcript which I’ve posted say another lawsuit in Texas had been filed against Oma’s company and his company this is not true and we’ve shown this by way of posting a copy of the actual page of the trial transcript and the District Clerks Office down there in Texas that validates what Oma has said, no other lawsuit in Texas existed between her company and Bob.
We’ve been hearing Bob has been forwarding documents which have been forwarded to us showing that he’s not lying, well, how come Bob couldn’t produce those documents when the courts asked him too?
I think he made them up because no where in the original documents he provided and the two additional supplemental documents are those documents. So why in the hell didn’t he produce this document then because he was ordered by the court to do so and only now found them – could it be because they didn’t exist in the first place?
Bob Atchison represented to the court and law enforcement the above document represented a true copy of the invoice sent to Enigma Films, it was not. Oma Hamou testified at trial that the e-mails which appear underneath the “alleged” invoice were altered and/or she did not create.
This is a true representation of the the document sent to Enigma from Atchison's, Pallasart Web Venture's on July 13, 2000 a document Pallasart deliberately WITHHELD because IT was protecting its CEO/FOUNDER/PRESIDENT Bob Atchison.
ONE YEAR BEFORE
Both Bob Atchison and his Then Attorney committed perjury at trial during his lawsuit with Oma Hamou let's read what Bob Atchison's then Attorney had to say to the court:
According to the State of Texas other than the then present lawsuit case No. GN303141between Atchison and Hamou no other lawsuit existed between the two.
BOB ATCHISON WON HIS LAWSUIT AGAINST OMA HAMOU BY COMMITTING THE CRIME OF PERJURY AND FORGERY TO NAME BUT A FEW. THERE IS NOTHING HONORABLE ABOUT THAT. WHO IS THE VICTIM BOB ATCHISON OR OMA HAMOU?
During the Trial in court transcripts real documents that a court reporter recorded Bob Atchison says under oath he was never involved in the California case where Oma sued him for defamation etc. well this is a lie because he filed pleadings in Pro Se and when the case got dismissed because the courts in California felt it didn't have the jurisdiction over Bob, Oma hired an attorney which then forced Bob to get someone to represent him.
During the Trial in court transcripts real documents that a court reporter recorded Bob Atchison says under oath he was never involved in the California case where Oma sued him for defamation etc. well this is a lie because he filed pleadings in Pro Se and when the case got dismissed because the courts in California felt it didn't have the jurisdiction over Bob, Oma hired an attorney which then forced Bob to get someone to represent him.
So, Bob Atchison the man who created the Alexander Palace Time Machine web site lied more than one time under oath in a Texas court room yet those on Pallasart's Forum believe the man's actions against my friend were justified - NO it isn't.
A Judge in Texas in her own hand wrote that if a Protective Order wasn’t in place my friend would get hurt and she has because Rob has went on to republish the same words found on Pallasart’s Oma Hamou Report web site to a site that provides a link to Rob’s blogs and both Rob and Bob continue to lie about Oma. And their friends over on the AP site seem to think that Bob and Rob are telling the truth about Oma and she has no right to defend herself against their lies because she owes money and all the rest of the nonsense they’ve said about her.
Well they are wrong. A Judge, Judge Livingston is Texas told Pallasart and Rob Moshein THEY were wrong. Oma has every right to defend herself against these horrible lies and people. A brief is being prepared to be filed in Federal Court against Bob Atchison and Pallasart. Like Penny Wilson I have a temper and cuss a lot but that doesn’t mean I am Oma or that Oma does this, yet people who have never met Oma pretend they know she does cuss.
Men who hide behind women’s name as Rob did when he registered with Classmates.com as Tonya Hoochie and sent pm’s to Oma pretending he went to the same school, hiding behind a false identity just to terrorize, humiliate and torment my friend are not men but cowards.
Source: http://www.omahamou.info/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=52&p=2099&sid=aadafd181e1a30e7b706944b5787bc92#p2099
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home