What is Legitimate?

What is Legitimate?

The AlexanderPalace.org web site, a work of love?
Update

Bob Atchison claims the only reason why he designed a website about the Alexander Palace was to educate the world on Russian history. He has said that he doesn't receive an income from doing any of this.

A quick glance at his site plus a little knowledge of marketing and how the Internet works, something called traffic and links, and I begin to question ---how much of this is a work of loveand how much that of a shrewd businessman?

Not only does he derive his income by using the name of Nicholas II, but it appears that the “Kuchumov Photographs” which “technically” belonged to the Russian government, will be used in an upcoming book that Mr. Atchison is said to be writing.

I wonder just who will profit from the sale of this book? Will any of Mr. Kuchumov’s heirs?

Bob Atchison is a clever and shrewd businessman. He left his job at Apple computer and started his own web/design/hosting company, Pallasart Web Ventures, Inc, located in Austin, Texas. He also created a website dedicated to the life of Nicholas II and life inside of the Alexander Palace which has links to Bob Atchison’s web/design/hosting company, Pallasart, his import/export furniture business and a site dedicated to selling religious icons. Bob Atchison derives some of his money from the sweat and blood of the Russian people by getting them to duplicate Imperial furniture and export this furniture or painting to the US where he then sells it at a higher price.

Is this "normal" capitalism?

It seems so on the surface, but think back to those images that create so much of the atmosphere at the Alexander Palace web site, the traffic that comes to see those images and that is directed to purchase this furniture, and Icons. I wonder, just what constitutes a fair markup or profit?Or looked at in reverse, how much was paid to the Russian craftsmen who made this furniture?

Notice that the traffic to this site is derived from links to the Alexander Palace web site from places such as Encyclopedia Britannica, all of which drives large numbers of people to look at this site where he then directs them to his web design business, his selling of religious Icons, and furniture --- pretty sharp use of a few photos…

As to all the money Bob Atchison is spending out of his own pocket to keep the AexanderPalace.org site alive, well the forum is run by “open source” software. Meaning that just like the last software that he used to run the forum it is free to anyone who wants to use it. So scratch that expense. Now sure a normal person would have to spend tons of money to provide bandwidth and storage space for a site like the AlexanderPalace.org, but as Bob owns his own servers, well that takes care of the monthly storage fee. Sure it cost to buy the server, but typically site are co-hosted and Bob is no different with 54 other sites on the same server as the AlexanderPalace.org site. His web design site quotes sites starting at $4,000 to create a site and he charged Oma about $100 a month to host a few pages. Assuming that is still the same… $216,000 up front in design fees (looking only at the minimum) will buy a huge server.

OK yes he has to pay for his time, but still he had to buy a server to host those other sites and I think you can see that even at say $20,000 for a top of the line monster server with multi-processors and RAID 5 hot swappable hard drives and a few hours of UPS power reserves that there was enough cash from just the web design work to pay for the server that runs AlexanderPalace.org and $5,400 a month income from just that one server should pay for a lot of bandwidth as typically if you have your own hosting company you buy it in a huge block for cheap. The way most hosting companies do it is that they balance the load by placing a high bandwidth / server load site along with a bunch of other sites who may be lucky to get a dozen hits a month. Checking with one reseller they offer a package for $69.00 a month that has the space to host 80 sites and provides 750 GIG of bandwidth, (that is about eighty-six cents per month per site) another host says that if you go over your bandwidth limit it is only $7.00 more per GIG, per month and the more you use the cheaper per month, per gig it gets. Also realize that repeat visitors have all the graphics and such stored up in their computer’s cache memory so that does not cause much bandwidth, and text only such as is on the forum is unbelievably cheap in terms of bandwidth. So in the whole equation of site hosting the human cost is the most expensive, but I had heard that the AlexanderPalace.org site was an act of love?

Which came first the Chicken or the Egg, or read that as Pallasart Web Design or the AP site? Now lets figure that with traffic in the millions of visitors per day because of links to it by sites such as Encyclopedia Britannica (Currently AlexanderPalace.org is ranked 139,135th in the world by Alexa) and when you look at the traffic details you will notice that about half, or a little less, of that traffic also checks out the Pallasart Web Design company where the visitor is exposed to advertising and of course there are links from the AlexanderPalace.org site to Bob’s Amber Palace Galleries and such.

So it seems that the AP.org site is a great source of advertising for Bob, which he would otherwise have to pay for. Of course any site that is linked to by AP.org gets immediate attention from the search engines because of its traffic rank and who links to it, (such as the Encyclopedia Britannica site.) So the whole AlexanderPalace.org site forms the nucleus of a major traffic magnet, buying Bob traffic for his profit centers at unbelievably cheap rates. That is one savvy and shrewd businessman!

QUOTE PALLASART'S MIKE PYLES A/K/A/ "VAPORS" "...I take personal offense at Hamou's using Russian history websites to support her grifts by trying to put the spit shine on her foul antics. As for donating money to something positive, I find putting a stop to her grifts on these sites sufficiently positive to warrant the investment of my time and money. Young people visit these sites in the formative stages of their interest in Russian history. It might not bother you that they would encounter a seedy grift passing itself off as the noble advancement of historical restoration and cultural advancement, but it does bother me..."

Thinking about Vapors reaction, and then how Bob Atchison has reacted --- could jealousy be at the heart of this? Having to share the Palace with Oma Hamou?An example (one of many illustrations) where Hamou's "Sarskaia Site" can be found on the web along side Bob Atchison's Alexander Palace Time Machine: Russian EmpireThe Sarskaia Foundation - Aims to preserve of cultural heritage in Russia. Current projects include the rehabilitation of the city of Pushkin's historic core. A link to the page that features Sarskaia is found

http://www.google.com/Top/Regional/Europe/Russia/Society_and_Culture/History/Russian_Empire/

So here we have a prime example of why jealousy might be exhibited 'just because' one of Oma's company’s is listed in search engines under the topic of Russian History...As I look at the situation it seems to me that the very thing Pyles, et. al. (Pallasart) have accused Oma and Enigma & Sarskaia of doing is the very thing that Bob Atchison's Alexander Palace Time Machine and his 'small' web design company, Pallasart Web ventures, Inc has been doing all these years --- yet no one until NOW has noticed - take a look.

Definitions:

Grift Pronunciation: 'grift Function: transitive verb Etymology: grift, n., perhaps alteration of graft slang : to obtain (money) illicitly (as in a confidence game)

So lets look at some past activities that “They” indulged in...

Art of Bob Atchison
Ikons: Windows Into Heaven

Virgin and Child with St. Francis
22 x 28 inches
acrylic on canvas - available for purchase, $1250

Queen Katherine
18 x 24 inches - acrylic on canvas - available for purchase, $2650

An English Madonna
18 x 24 inchesacrylic on canvas - available for purchase, $3250

St. George of England
18 x 24 inches acrylic on canvas - available for purchase, $2450

Virgin and Child with two Angels
24 x 48 inches acrylic on canvas - available for purchase, $1450

More paintings are featured on Pallasart's site for lesser amounts....

Question: Is this extra income reported to the IRS by either Pallasart or Bob Atchison as an individual? Does this "Icon" business exist as a DBA/corporation or a subordinate entity of Pallasart?

AMBER PALACE GALLERIES - PALLASART

101 Laurel LaneAustin, Texas 78705

Question: Another subordinate entity under Pallasart? Is the extra income reflected on Pallasart's Tax Records? Does Amber Palace Galleries records reflect the Import tax (also known as an import duty or import tariff) on every import?

Bob Atchison's Internet Club

THE ALEXANDER PALACE ASSOCIATION

Source: http://web.archive.org/web/20050818183442/http://www.alexanderpalace.org/palace/apaspr98.html -

Notice the Archive Site Date August 2005

NOW COMES Robert D. Atchison, Plaintiff, and responds to the Requests for Production propounded by Oma Hamou pursuant to Rule 196 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

10. All corporate documents pertaining to Pallasart Web Ventures, Inc., and The Alexander Palace Association.

RESPONSE: OBJECTION. This Request for Production of Documents is vague and is equally as available to Defendant as it is a matter of public record. However, subject to the foregoing objection and without waiving the same, Plaintiff is providing a copy of the information found on the Secretary of State’s Website stating that Pallasart Web Ventures, Inc. is a Domestic Business Corporation that is in good standing in the State of Texas and has been in existence since 1999. The Alexander Palace Association is not a registered business as Defendant took the incorporation papers from Plaintiff.

DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY SLATER'S RESPONSE: This response is not acceptable. There may be numerous corporate documents not publicly available and those documents are sought. The statement that Defendant is in possession of the incorporation documents pertaining to the Alexander Palace Association is nonsensical and false. These documents are relevant in that these organizations amount to engines of fraud and defamation and have been utilized by Plaintiff in undertaking the wrongdoing complained of by Counter Plaintiffs.

15. Any and all documents related to the formation of the Alexander Palace Association, as the identity of its officers, directors, managers and board members.

RESPONSE: There are no documents related to the formation of the Alexander Palace Association, and the identity of its officers, directors, managers and board members.

ANSWER NOT ACCEPTED

DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY SLATER'S NOTE: Defendant/Counter Plaintiffs seek documents, which provide information related to the identity of the above referenced officers, directors, managers and board members. It is not credible that Plaintiff has no documents that reveal any portion of this information as the entity in question could not function or be operated by Plaintiff in the absence of this information. The response is obviously evasive.

26. Any and all documents that refer or relate to any restoration or other or activity of Pallasart, the Alexander Palace Association or you with respect to any of the Alexander Palace or the Fedorovsky Cathedral.

RESPONSE: OBJECTION. Plaintiff objections to Defendant’s Request for Production No. 26 in that it is not reasonably limited in time or scope. However, without waiving the foregoing objection, Plaintiff has no documents in his possession dated subsequent to the year 2000 when he met the Plaintiff that would satisfy this request.

DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY SLATER'S NOTE: The objection that the request is “not proper” is meaningless and insufficient to inform Defendants’ of the basis of the objection. These documents are relevant to this case as Plaintiff has published on the Internet and on his website, The Alexander Palace Time Machine, that the Alexander Palace Association has contributed money towards the restoration of these Russian monuments in touting his expertise and accomplishments which will be at issue in this case.

27. Describe what work, if any, that Pallasart, the Alexander Palace Association or you perform on either the Alexander Palace or the Fedorovsky Cathedral.

RESPONSE: OBJECTION. Plaintiff objects to Request for Production No. 27 in that it is not a proper request for Production of Documents. Plaintiff does not have any documents in his possession that would satisfy this Request for Production.

DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY SLATER'S NOTE: The objection that the request is “not proper” is meaningless and insufficient to inform Defendants’ of the basis of the objection. These documents are relevant to this case as Plaintiff has published on the Internet and on his website, The Alexander Palace Time Machine, that the Alexander Palace Association has contributed money towards the restoration of these Russian monuments in touting his expertise and accomplishments which will be at issue in this case.

Source: OmaHamou.com

Question: Why didn't Mr. Atchison produce one document which would've supported statements published on the web concerning his Internet Web Club, the Alexander Palace Association activity/contributions towards the restoration of the Alexander Palace or the Fedorvsky Cathedral?

Where did the money designated for the restoration of the Alexander Palace or Fedorovsky Cathedral by the general public go? Did Pallasart/Mr. Atchison reflect this extra income on its/personal Tax Records?

According to information found on OmaHamou.com Pallasart/Mr. Atchison coordinated and acted as a furniture broker for "Nathaniel Byron" of Houston, Texas.

Question: Does Pallasart's records reflect the Import tax on every import from its association with Nathaniel Byron - Pallasart?

Trianon Studios

Trianon Studios
101 Laurel Lane
Austin, TEXAS 78705, USA

Pallasart Web Ventures,Inc. - Pallasart Web Design Company

Austin Web Design Services 101 Laurel Lane, Austin, Texas 78705

QUOTE MIKE NEWSON FROM AA LEGENDS: "...I suspect that Rob Moshein read that if the corporation was not in good standing then according to 172.252 (1) “the corporation shall be denied the right to sue or defend in a court of this state;” I suspect that this flared up bright in Rob’s mind, --- here is a way out --- not reading the rest of the effects of Forfeiture of Charter, because he found what he wanted to see. Also remember that this is a two part forfeiture, the first one is of loss of privilege, the second of loss of charter, that is even the loss of the name, a death.

Next the law quoted in “that blog” entry states something that you need to look at very closely. “If the corporation whose right to do business has been forfeited takes the necessary action to promptly remedy the defect causing the forfeiture;…” notice this phrase, " whose right to do business has been forfeited…” 'Whose right to do business has been forfeited…’(Also notice the word “prompt” I doubt that around a years delay would be considered “prompt” legally speaking.) Also remember I am quoting information that “that blog” reported as my source. …Hmmm does that not sound like what “we” have said, as well as Rachel said here on Legends after she talked to the, “Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Taxpayer Services and Collections Central Services Building, Suite 180 1711 San Jacinto Boulevard Austin TX 78701-1416 (512) 463-4865. (APO 8/2006)

Or the fact that later a "Ron Bardo" from the Comptroller’s office confirmed what was told to her by the accounts maintenance division that as far as “he was concerned Pallasart was a corporation that didn't exist.”

Quote: A Tax Specialist in the Open Record Division for the State of Texas, Mr. Patrick Merrell at 800-252-1386 confirmed what was told to Ivanka and others by the Secretary of State, the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts & the Tax Franchise division --- when Pallasart's charter was taken away in February 2006 they didn't have the right to conduct business under the name of this defunct corporation.”

So getting back to law and remembering that Pallasart had their Charter Forfeited as well, not just the loss of Corporate Privileges, we find:

SUBCHAPTER F. FORFEITURE OF CORPORATE PRIVILEGES

§ 171.251. FORFEITURE OF CORPORATE PRIVILEGES. The comptroller shall forfeit the corporate privileges of a corporation on which the franchise tax is imposed if the corporation:

(1) does not file, in accordance with this chapter and within 45 days after the date notice of forfeiture is mailed, a report required by this chapter;

(2) does not pay, within 45 days after the date notice of forfeiture is mailed, a tax imposed by this chapter or does not pay, within those 45 days, a penalty imposed by this chapter relating to that tax; or

(3) does not permit the comptroller to examine under Section 171.211 of this code the corporation's records.

171.2515. FORFEITURE OF RIGHT OF TAXABLE ENTITY TO TRANSACT BUSINESS IN THIS STATE.

(a) The comptroller may, for the same reasons and using the same procedures the comptroller uses in relation to the forfeiture of the corporate privileges of a corporation, forfeit the right of a taxable entity to transact business in this state.

(b) The provisions of this subchapter, including Section 171.255, that apply to the forfeiture of corporate privileges apply to the forfeiture of a taxable entity's right to transact business in this state.

The next paragraph is where “that blog” started to quote, so there is no need to continue to quote here, go to the Texas page if you want to read it all in one continuous flow.

Now we look at forfeiture of the corporate charter a few paragraphs further on…
(Which is found at the same link as loss of corporate privilege, and again we don’t need to read the whole thing here, so go to the link if you want to read all of it.)

SUBCHAPTER G. FORFEITURE OF CHARTER OR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY

This is why Bob Atchison/Pallasart lost his charter.

§ 171.301. GROUNDS FOR FORFEITURE OF CHARTER OR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY. It is a ground for the forfeiture of a corporation's charter or certificate of authority if:

(1) the corporate privileges of the corporation are forfeited under this chapter and the corporation does not pay, within 120 days after the date the corporate privileges are
forfeited, the amount necessary for the corporation to revive under this chapter its corporate privileges; or

(2) the corporation does not permit the comptroller to examine the corporation's records under Section 171.211 of this code.

§ 171.302. CERTIFICATION BY COMPTROLLER. After the 120th day after the date that the corporate privileges of a corporation are forfeited under this chapter, the comptroller shall certify the name of the corporation to the attorney general and the secretary of state.

§ 171.309. FORFEITURE BY SECRETARY OF STATE. The secretary of state may forfeit the charter or certificate of authority of a corporation if:

(1) the secretary receives the comptroller's certification under Section 171.302 of this code;

(2) the corporation does not revive its forfeited corporate privileges within 120 days after the date that the corporate privileges were forfeited; and

(3) the corporation does not have assets from which a judgment for any tax, penalty, or court costs imposed by this chapter may be satisfied.

§ 171.310. JUDICIAL PROCEEDING NOT REQUIRED FOR FORFEITURE BY SECRETARY OF STATE. The forfeiture by the secretary of state of a corporation's charter or certificate of authority under this chapter is effected without a judicial proceeding.

§ 171.311. RECORD OF FORFEITURE BY SECRETARY OF STATE. The secretary of state shall effect a forfeiture of a corporation's charter or certificate of authority under this chapter by inscribing on the corporation's record in the secretary's office the words "Charter Forfeited" or "Certificate Forfeited," the date on which this inscription is made, and a citation to this chapter as authority for the forfeiture.

Now this is what Bob had to do to revive his company this month (October 17, 2006).

§ 171.312. REVIVAL OF CHARTER OR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY AFTER FORFEITURE BY SECRETARY OF STATE. A corporation whose charter or certificate of authority is forfeited under this chapter by the secretary of state is entitled to have its charter or certificate revived and to have its corporate privileges revived
if:

(1) the corporation files each report that is required by this chapter and that is delinquent;

(2) the corporation pays the tax, penalty, and interest that is imposed by this chapter and that is due at the time the request under Section 171.313 of this code to set aside
forfeiture is made; and

(3) the forfeiture of the corporation's charter or certificate is set aside in a proceeding under Section 171.313 of this code.

§ 171.313. PROCEEDING TO SET ASIDE FORFEITURE BY SECRETARY OF STATE. (a) If a corporation's charter or certificate of authority is forfeited under this chapter by the secretary of state, a stockholder, director, or officer of the corporation at
the time of the forfeiture of the charter or certificate or of the corporate privileges of the corporation may request in the name of the corporation that the secretary of state set aside the forfeiture of the charter or certificate.

(b) If a request is made, the secretary of state shall determine if each delinquent report has been filed and any delinquent tax, penalty, or interest has been paid. If each report
has been filed and the tax, penalty, or interest has been paid, the secretary shall set aside the forfeiture of the corporation's charter or certificate of authority.

§ 171.314. CORPORATE PRIVILEGES AFTER FORFEITURE BY SECRETARY OF STATE IS SET ASIDE. If the secretary of state sets aside under this chapter the forfeiture of a corporation's charter or certificate of authority, the comptroller shall revive the corporate privileges of the corporation.

http://www.omahamou.com/PDF/PallasartReinstatement.pdf

This part is very interesting, notice the implications!

§ 171.315. USE OF CORPORATE NAME AFTER REVIVAL OF CHARTER OR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY. If a corporation's charter or certificate of authority is forfeited under this chapter by the secretary of state and if the corporation requests the secretary to set aside the forfeiture under Section 171.313 of this code, the corporation shall determine from the secretary whether the corporation's name is available for use. If the name is not available, the corporation shall amend its charter or certificate to change its name.

Notice that the very name of the corporation was taken away if it’s charter was forfeited….

So if the name of the corporation was taken away, how could they continue to do business in the name of the corporation? Not to mention that Texas law said that they no longer had the right to conduct business as normal for Pallasart, Inc.? And if so, why did they continue to do so ignoring the law?

Of course this is not the first time, that “they” have done so. Back when the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) was in full effect, Rob Moshein said that Bob Atchison had told him to say something to someone (Olga, mentioned above, was one of those people, most of whom have sent us the communications in question.) that meant that Rob Moshein was saying and doing things specifically in direct violation of the restraining order. Even the way that he went about removing the Oma Hamou Report dot org site, and how images were left up, while the rest was just blocked, and after seeing how they selectively blocked specific IPs from the AP forum the question is, was that site just as selectively blocked. Then we have Data Lounge and how “someone” (and yes they cooperated in telling us what IP and other identifying information was used to create those posts) posted about Oma Hamou and provided a link back to a web archive of the Oma Hamou Report dot org, and this was during the period when the TRO was in effect. So again a thumbing of the nose at the law was not an unusual event. I could pick event after event, but this is enough to see a pattern.

Over time we have seen a pattern of “them” hiding behind web aliases, Gilbert McDuff is the most infamous of these as Rob/Bob, which ever one really did it, posted Oma Hamou’s Social Security number on the web using this web entity, as in who cares if it is legal or even moral/ethical, because - as was basically said when this happened, if you won’t believe me, you have forced me to do this act. A number of posts have been made in various names and at various times and places, many names of which Rob Moshein admitted to and can be seen in the TRO, enough so that it is very natural that “they” seem to feel that anyone who defends Oma Hamou, must be Oma hiding behind a web name --- because that is what they do…. Notice this last series of accusations about Oma’s, “fictional pscyho alter ego boyfriend Mike Newson.” Does that not fit that pattern? (As well as the propaganda technique of denigration?)

We keep hearing that Bob Atchison is the victim, yet who went to Russia to stop who? Who wrote and called banks and such saying don’t believe Oma Hamou she has no project, she is a fugitive on the run from the law, she scams people? Who started up a web page full of Hate, that turned into a full fledged site that was pushed to the top of Google’s search pages? Who has tried to get who tossed in jail many times, even trying to get America’s most wanted to film Wyoming arresting them because they would be in Texas for court related events?..."

Additional Information: From February through December 2004, Pallasart was suspended by the State of Texas from acting as a legitimate business entity. Why did it continue to conduct business as usual?

;">

Link to the Travis County Petition to the courts

Sources: OmaHamou.com, AA Legends, Pallasweb.com, amberpalacegalleries.com, trianonstudios.com, www.bobatchison.co.uk & nbpempire.com

Friends are great and evil is never total...

In 2004 on Oma Hamou.com Forum "Jim" responded to a message posted by "Tonya Hoochie" a/k/a Rob Moshein:

Friends are great and evil is never total.

I just watched a report on an old man who systematically kidnapped and raped young girls and held them captive in a small damp dungeon for years raping them daily. After he was caught they managed to convince him that the girls may have been harmed by the experience, he was really sorry. Poor guy. He's not a bad guy; he was just a victim of his sex drive.

In the news some time ago there was a nice, bright intelligent young lady who was killed by a Rotweiler. The dog's owners said it was her own fault and the dog was just being a dog.

Oma Hamou has some faults, but not one of them is a lack of ABSOLUTE sincerity and commitment to her film project and restoration projects in Russia. Oma lives and breaths and works her heart out day and night for her projects. Her commitment and effort and are beyond reason, they seem fundamental to her soul. I have seen her live and slave through 3 years of distress anguish and effort and commitment, facing disappointment after disappointment.

Also all the while being stabbed in the back by your back stabbing, cowardly friend, Bob Atchison who has dedicated himself single mindedly for the same years Oma has been putting forth her finest efforts and creativity and sacrifice, to sabotaging her tireless efforts.

There is NOTHING justifiable about Bob Atchison’s vicious attacks and sabotage. He has broken Oma's heart so many times, I am surprised it still beats, and beats for nothing except to meet every challenge make every effort to fulfill her restoration and film projects. Even if some of what he says is true, the number of lies is staggering and the effort Bob Atchison has put into destroying Oma is insane. One of the more heart breaking aspects of this is that most of these years Bob Atchison was hiding in the dark taking pot shots anonymously. I've always hoped she succeeds.

One has to admire such commitment, but even I was thinking, "What is the matter with this woman. This is (long past) the time to give up. Duh! (Ok, it’s a Ferrari already, but it doesn't work.)"

It is only recently that Bob Atchison’s cowardly attacks have seen the light of day and been debunked. Now I have a new perspective on Oma's "Ferrari" that didn't work.

Half million dollar Ferrari and it only didn't work because it had a snake in the air cleaner. Maybe Oma was more right than obsessed.

You can stick up for Bob Atchison and the rotweiller and the old sex slaver.

You can stick up for Attila the Hun. It's not illegal, but freedom of speech does not include the right to systematically try to destroy someone as Bob Atchison has done to Oma. Bob Atchison’s attacks have nothing to do with civic duty; they are founded in self serving, petty jealousy or some other perversion.

The Energy Summit of 2003 and Enigma Films

Update

On AA Legends Justin Edwards posted: “…Mike and I both were accused of faking Ms. Hamou’s Energy Summit pass. Even when we showed that the pass had been photographed years ago, among many other related documents, still it was claimed a fake. We were interrogated on this forum on a daily basis and any time we forgot ourselves and published letters from anyone in support of our position or other information “someone” would contact the various person(s) and told them the story “reported” here, that Oma Hamou is under investigation in a Missing Person Case (which was never true) and various other things. For example when we mentioned about Oma going to Russia, one of the first things that came from Mike Piles was --- what agency would grant Oma a VISA as she is a criminal…It’s this kind of interfering with someone’s right to travel, to earn a living and exhibiting the same modus operandi as Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein…”

QUOTE MIKE NEWSON: "...This is just one of many well documented letters to one of Oma’s business colleagues I pulled from Oma Hamou’s lawsuit with Bob Atchison, Rob Moshein and Pallasart.

Notice at the bottom of Bob’s letter to the one of Oma’s business associates he informs them: “I have contacted the US State Department who told me they will advise the US Embassy in Moscow regarding this….” Yet the US State department informed Oma’s attorney that none of its representatives had ever said this to Bob --- so why make the statement as if it had happened? Although, IF the US State Department Talked with / Agreed with “BOB ATCHISON” then certainly “whoever” should also believe…

Bob called the US State Department after he viewed this letter on Sarskaia’s website:

Unbeknownst to Bob Atchison and his people, Oma Hamou had been invited to participate in the second Energy Summit by both the Russian and US government which involved the Alexander Palace and some other buildings. Often Oma’s projects and her name were in the press and on television which made Bob Atchison extremely jealous - remember Bob filed his original lawsuit against Oma in August of 2003 claiming she had slandered him in the Russian press yet he couldn’t offer one shred of evidence that this had happened. Not one Russian newspaper or elsewhere linked his name with Oma Hamou, Enigma Films or Sarskaia yet he claimed it had happened in court documents but in truth it never did, and “they” could show no evidence to support this claim. http://omahamou.com/PDF/BobAtchisonOriginalLawsuit82303.PDF

THE APO BLOG: As a note, one is not allowed to roam inside of the World Bank complex without proper clearance which means Oma Hamou had to have a specific appointment with a specific person in order to gain access.

QUOTE OMA HAMOU: "...When I formed Sarskaia a different world opened up and wonderful things began to happen. I found myself traveling to Washington D.C., lobbying my foundation's efforts to rehabilitate the city of Pushkin's historic core. I went there to raise awareness of the importance of Enigma's film project and what this one project could do. It wasn't easy because people just didn't care about restoring buildings in Russia. I went to Washington D.C. knowing that they all knew the good, the bad, and the ugly about my life, I didn't lie. I came from an honest approach, and my persistence paid off because soon after I was introduced to different organizations that could assist me in providing technical and logistical support in the rehabilitation of the city of Pushkin’s historic core.

When I met with the government officials and the religious leaders, all the rumors that Bob Atchison and his associates were saying about me worried me made me afraid. Afraid that they wouldn't take my projects or me seriously. I wanted to make sure that both the US, and Russian governments, the financial institutions and the Moscow Patriarch all understood that there was a perception, a negative one, about me. And instead of worrying about it, they were sorry that I had to go through all that. It was so outside all the negative things that were being said about me. They just knew me as someone that worked hard.

Russia is an ancient region that has given civilization so much - in science, mathematics, culture, and religion. I have learned that knowledge and the exchange of ideas are the key to not only our cooperation but to our collaboration. We can all make a difference. Learning about our countries and cultures - and respecting their values and aspiration - is imperative. We are linked in so many ways: not only by trade and finance, but also by migration, environment, disease, drugs, crime, conflict and - yes- terrorism. We are linked - rich and poor alike - by a shared desire to leave a better world to our children. There is nothing more satisfying when you help others, if you can help a child, a family, if you can help restore a church, or a palace, build a school or do something to make things better for other people, it just feels better!

After almost a year of hard work I received a letter of support from the US State Department. It was an honor to particpate in the Second US-Russian Energy Summit in St. Petersburg, Russia. When my staff posted the US State Department's letter on Sarskaia's website, Bob Atchison called not only them but other governmental officials both in the U.S. and in Russia and told them that I could not be trusted, that I had no film project, and that I was fugitive on the run. None of what Bob said was true. However, there is great power in the printed word. Once published on the Internet, broadcast on TV or talked about it is capable of becoming accepted as fact and unfortunately much of what has been presented by Bob Atchison and his associates strays far from the truth. The misinformation, because it is negative and colorful, seems to have greater staying power. There comes a point where you have to draw a line in the sand and say, like the character Howard Beale in the movie Network, "I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!"

For years I tolertated Bob Atchison's attacks, merely wanting him to stop, but this last vile vicious attack has brought me to a level of seeking the fullest legal remedies available to me. We live in a country where all people are supposed to have equal rights, but it is also a country where we all have to be vigilant to protect those rights. I know that having lies told about me or having my name published on a website is but a small problem compared to the struggles that so many people go through every day. I do not pretend to compare my problems with the inequalities that exist on a larger scale, but I do think that standing up against injustice in our own lives is part of becoming active participants in our communities and in our country. (June 2004)

More letters we found on the web:

Excerpts from Oma Hamou's letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin:

Excerpts from Oma Hamou's Affidavit:

"...Enigma & Sarskaia are real companies with real projects – companies that have vision and values, companies that people are proud to work for and with, companies whose employees and those who worked as an independent contractor worked very hard to do the right thing each and every day they came to work, people who cared about and gave their time and talents to make Enigma’s & Sarskaia’s projects work. What Pallasart and its associates did to Enigma, Sarskaia has caused tremendous hardship for scores of Enigma & Sarskaia’s associates in both the US and in Russia. Many of these same people have continued to support Enigma & Sarskaia’s projects even though there has been no income, simply because of their belief in the dream. This has caused hurt to many as they continued even after the funding was disrupted before seeking other income. The belief in the project was too strong in all of us to give up..." http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/affidavit/affidavit.pdf

Bob Atchison/Pallasart's actions appears to have impeded the progress of Enigma/Sarskaia's projects and did cause each to suffer great economic hardships all because some one over at Pallasart believes HE owns the rights to the Alexander Palace and Nicholas II - now that's pretty creepy!

Source: http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/11/cult-surrounding-alexander-palace-in.html &*AA Legends & OmaHamou.com

It's Only Words...

Last night on AA Legends Mike Newson posted:

As I said last time “Pallasart” is working very hard to find a way to destroy me. How? By attacking me personally with words in order to destroy my reputation, that is an assault on my character, just like they did to Oma Hamou.

I was on the phone with Oma and she said this or as close to it as memory served,

QUOTE OMA HAMOU: “In my entire life not one person has hated me with such a strong passion and venom as the Bob/Rob/Pallasart clique does. Not even my ex-husband and you know what he did to me! I know of people who don’t like me, but they don’t hate me enough to go out of their way and harm me or my ability to earn a living as Bob/Rob and those associated with the Pallasart clique do! Bob says he talks with the spirit of Alexandra Russia’s last Czarista and I’ve been told that he has said that she told him that she does not like me, maybe this is his motivation? I just don’t know. I don’t know why these people do the things that they’ve done against me in the name of Nicholas II or his wife Alexandra or Russian history, period. With all my heart and soul Mike, I want Bob Atchison and whoever else they are looking at in the criminal investigation, I want them to go to jail. I pray every day for justice. I’m constantly reassured that this time around Bob and them are not going to be able to lie and wiggle out of the culpability of the crimes they’ve perpetrated against me and others. Patience is a virtue but you know me I have very little ‘patience’.”

And in the destruction of Oma Hamou, many of the rest of us have suffered. And not just because she feels emotional pain which we share in, but with our careers and income. Much of her stress has been caused because of Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison attempting to destroy her. This stress has affected her physically, so her health has suffered as well as the emotional pain, and financial ruin. Still she refuses to quit, and if she refuses can I be any less?

I want to bring up a major point. I have not said Bob/Rob is/are a flawed person(s) intrinsically. I have said that what they have done, that is their behaviors towards my friend are wrong. No one should have to suffer as she has for the past six years. What has she done that is so horrible as to deserve this treatment for six long years? I’ve defended her, and this justifies whatever they want to do to me?

Read back over what I have written. I have not in cold blood sat down and tried to find a way to attack either of them as a person. I have found flaws in what they have tried to say Oma Hamou was, and I have attacked those flaws to show that they have an obsession to destroy her. I have pointed out that this is their standard method when they don’t like someone or want them “removed” such as what they did or attempted to do to; Penny Wilson, Peter Kurth and Greg King, (those are just examples.) I have pointed out specifics directly associated with their actions toward Oma, but I have not cast about for ways to say that they are intrinsically evil. According to the inner circle they have consulted with lawyers to see if they can get me on libel, the report was that they could not as I was not telling an untruth. That is did “they” say/do those things? As the answer was yes, then what I write to educate you about those actions/words can not be considered libel. As an aside --- consider this, Rob/Bob have said that they are just reporting public records and as such it is not libel. However, if you have read what they concluded about the records you will find it fits the Yellow Journalism method of controlling the reader by offering truth, truth, truth, and then the lie and usually a “Big Lie” which turns it into libel.

What I have heard from the inner circle is that they are going to try and figure out how to attack me personally and say that I am intrinsically evil. From what Rob Moshein has said in the past I wager it is via the “Porn” angle, and yes I have taken photos of nudes, try visiting any great art museum and look at the works there. The question is what did I see inside myself, and what did I try to show to my audience?).

It has already started by the creation of my own little “Hate Mike” Blog. That is --- find and point out all my flaws and feet of clay, (real or imagined. With a core of truth, or without, and then twisted for maximum effect in destroying someone, typically slipping in “the Big Lie” to finish it off with a cherry on top of the whipping cream) and then publish them all for the world to see, better yet we will force the world to come and see them. As when we destroy him as a person, we destroy him as a “White Knight”, and Oma Hamou is left alone and she will “die.”

Well you know, it won’t be hard, I’ve never claimed to be a paragon of virtue. I am human, maybe more so than most. I have flaws; physically, mentally, morally, emotionally, financially, you name it… I have fallen, (many times) picked my self up and kept going. I have made mistakes, MANY mistakes, I have tried to learn and keep on going. I have done things that I am not proud of. I have also done things that I am proud of. Possibly my only strength is that I keep getting back up. Maybe what I am trying to say is that I am human, possibly more so than many, but still human with normal human weaknesses. Many a White Knight spent their nights drinking and whoring way back in history, as was the custom of the land, yet in the morning they were back in the saddle and off to protect the innocent. Did what they do at night that we might have found distasteful take away from the good they did? Do my past, (or even my present) mistakes counter the logic behind what I show that they have attempted to do to Oma is wrong or incorrect? Do my personal flaws and failings invalidate the points of logic that I have used to show that what they said about Oma was not true, or invalidate the Yellow Journalism propaganda techniques that I have shown to be in use against Oma (and now myself?)

In a way I feel like Obi Wan going up against Darth Vader in episode four, “You can't win Darth. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine." Some how I feel that, for those who count, this predicted attack on my self will change the tide of sympathy, and my words will be heard with the strength of a martyr.

A Mirror to the soul

When you look at whatever Rob Moshein/Bob Atchison find/create about me, and how they twist it, and the conclusions that they come up with… remember this is how you see inside of someone. You take what they find personally in someone else and that typically is what that person has inside themselves. You have to have it inside yourself before you can see it in others, unless you have had a lot of training/experience and even then your gut reaction is based on what is inside yourself. In creating a web site to say Who is Mike Newson they have started that process, as we can now look at their actions and see inside them, to their very core. Question, what do you see when you look at “them” in this light? I found inside of Oma much that is beautiful, desirable and admirable, They found much that was ugly and evil. So which is she? Could I suggest that she is human also and maybe a little of both sides as are we all? The question is why do I see what I see in Oma, and why do they see what they see in her?

You know, even now I see much to be admired in Bob Atchison, his drive and determination and outright love of things about the last of the Czars. Rob Moshein in his all consuming love (as I perceive it) for Bob, even though Bob downplays Rob’s contributions, still I see much love between the two. Yes I hate what they have done to my friend, and myself, and even fear what they will yet do. But I don’t hate them. It is not inside me to see evil, instead I see that which is good and beautiful. That I pity them for what they see in others such as Oma in terms of evil and ugly, does not leave me wide open for them to control me. As I am aware of what the emotion of pity can open wide in a person in terms of controlling that person.

That is, do you find me making personal attacks about Bob Atchison or Rob Moshein? Do I attack the way they eat? The way they walk? Their choice in movies? Their choice in loves? Or do I say, look they said XYZ about Oma and it is incorrect because of ZYX? Or maybe look for the patterns, because they did this to this person, and the same things again over here and over there? Am I finding isolated events that do not relate to the Oma vs. Bob war of word and saying OH! look here, this is the kind of person they Really are!!!! Don’t believe them about this other thing over there because really they are this horrible person.

Am I searching out their flaws with the cold blooded intention of only destroying? Making background checks, searching for their personal shortcomings? Or is what I talk about directly related to what they have said or done towards Oma Hamou? Is what I have done, done in defense, because of what they have done to one of my friends, and no one else was willing to stand up and be the target, justify their attack on me?. (Actually many have stood up to be targets, and were targeted and destroyed. I seem to have been harder to destroy so it appears that they are going to take a special interest in destroying me this time.)

Why is it that instead of attacking my logic as I point out the fallacies in what they have used to attack Oma Hamou with that instead they attack my self as a person? Is it that they can not counter my arguments as they are true and thus they feel forced to destroy me as the only way to counter what I have pointed out? Have they (either one or both) become my “victim,” think about it if you have heard this from “them.” Are they Oma’s victim? Have you been lead to pity them? What has the emotion of pity done to your objectivity? Has it destroyed it to the point that you feel that Oma and I deserve whatever they want to do to us? Think about this factor… Who was it that first attacked?

Also consider what damage is done to the sword that is used to attack with. Or more specifically when one wields a sword against one person by maliciously gossiping about what happened with someone else, then both will be hurt. The person who the words were meant to attack, and the person who was the sword of that attack.

Father Markell was the sword of attack and it hurt him so bad that he had to go before his superiors and defend himself. So who was really the one hurt? Oma or Father Markell, or was it both equally, and the one wielding the sword (Bob/Rob) walked away.

Now we have the family of the elder Morton that was recently wielded as a sword against Oma. Who was hurt? What did “their” wielding that particular sword against Oma do to that family? Could it be that once again “they” have hurt the very people that they were using as a weapon against Oma? And the one wielding the sword (Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein) walked away.

Now the question is, who else will they hurt in their quest to destroy me as well as Oma Hamou?

Do the ends justify the means?

Think about these thoughts, see if you can see patterns and where do these ideas fit?

(Note, “They,” in the following bullet point list, is not the Royal “They” - that is it is not intended to indicate those from Pallasart as a group, but rather the person or persons who do the action or behavior talked about. Or - as the sentence would normally read and that word order would indicate” Also think of the fact that this list was one that described a specific group of people with similar known and recognized traits so that people could learn to recognize this group and how some people react to them...)

· very few people, when put to the test, have the integrity and moral courage to stand up against bullying, harassment, corruption etc; the target is selected often because that person has this moral courage; most people will pass by on the other side, only targets have the integrity to be a good Samaritan

· bystanders think that if they keep their heads down, their mouths shut and pretend nothing is happening then it won't happen to them [wrong – their turn will come eventually]

· they exert power and control by a combination of selectively withholding information and spreading disinformation, therefore everyone has a distorted picture - of only what they want them to see

· they go to great lengths to undermine their target

· they are masters of manipulation, and are fond of manipulating people through their emotions (eg guilt)

· they are adept at manipulating peoples' perceptions with intent to engender a negative view of the target in the minds of bystanders, this is achieved through undermining, including the creation of doubts and suspicions and the sharing of false concerns

· They poison the atmosphere and actively poison people's minds against the target

· when close to being outwitted and exposed, they feign victimhood and turn the focus on themselves - another example of manipulating people through their emotion of guilt, eg sympathy, feeling sorry

· most bystanders are hoodwinked by their ruses for abdicating responsibility and evading accountability

· they encourage and manipulate bystanders to lie, act dishonorably and dishonestly, withhold information and spread misinformation

· they manipulate bystanders to punish the target for alleged infractions, ie the bystanders become instruments of harassment

· they are often able to bewitch one especially emotionally needy bystander into being their easily controlled spokesperson / advocate / supporter / denier

· they often form an alliance with someone who has the same behavior profile, thus increasing the levels of threat, fear and dysfunction

· they are able to charm and manipulate a number of bystanders to act as supporters, assistants, reinforcers, appeasers, deniers, apologists and minimisers

· some people gain gratification (a perverse feeling of satisfaction) from seeing others in distress and thus become complicit

· they groom bystanders, and the target, to believe the target deserves the treatment they are receiving

· they are a smooth individual who excels at deception using a combination of compulsive lying, Jekyll and Hyde nature, manipulation, mimicry of normal behavior, self-assuredness and charm

· the bystanders see only the Dr Jekyll side of the bully, but only the target sees the Mr/Ms Hyde side; Dr Jekyll is sweet and charming, Mr/Ms Hyde is evil; Mr/Ms Hyde is the real person, Dr Jekyll is an act

· apathy is rampant · denial is everywhere

Bob Atchison Plots Against Oma Hamou

The APO combed through the collections of the Internet archives to analyze and synthesize the information buried on both Bob Atchison, Oma Hamou & Pallasart but "often" our attempts to dig further was met with formidable resistence as certain information which once we could easily lay our hands on was now removed offline or restricted.

June 3, 2004

Mike Newson's Affidavit:

Notice the date June 7, 2004

June 10, 2004

According to Ms. Hamou's statements to law enforcement the "alleged" hitman claimed he had arranged a meeting between representatives of the U.N. and Sarskaia regarding an "Non Government Organization" status. The U.N. officials stated no such meeting had been arranged and furthermore the dates in question were set to kick off a "Millineum Conference" not to meet with Ms. Hamou. It would appear that a professional con was being played out on Ms. Hamou.

June 13, 2004

According to the police report(s) the "alleged" hit man presented Ms. Hamou with a series of invoices for services he claimed was performed on her behalf. According to the police report(s) basically this was a con to get Ms. Hamou to fork over a large sum of money. The "alleged" meeting at the UN didn't exist, the State of Nevada's record showed no reservation of the name and/or corporation of either Sarskaia or Enigma.

From what we've been able to determine from the Internet Archive site a flurry of emails was sent to Enigma on June 16, 2004 demanding payment on the above invoices. When Sarskaia refused it appears the "alleged" hit man/wife issued a series of threats against Ms. Hamou and eventually contacted Bob Atchison.

June 17, 2004

Excerpts from Oma Hamou Affidavit:

Source: http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/affidavit/affidavit.pdf

(59) Evidence provided by Mr. Atchison though our request for “Production of Documents” shows that on June 17, 2004 Mr. Atchison was contacted by a Patricia…. There is nothing contained within this email communication that refers to a ‘Murder for Hire Plot’

Upon receipt of this letter Mr. Atchison sent back a reply and requested a telephone number for Patricia … – obviously she provided a telephone number but we simply don’t know how it happened because Mr. Atchison never provided us with that information. We have no idea as to how many other emails or communications were sent that he did not provide to us. The next communication that we know of is one where (again) he selectively ‘cut & pasted’ from an email that Patricia … sent to him later that same evening.

(60) I would also like to bring to the courts attention that in Mr. Atchison’s “Plaintiff’s First Supplemental Response to Defendant’s Request for Disclosure and Request for Production of Documents Numbers 3, 3, 8 and 9” Mr. Atchison’s attaches what appears to be a letter dated June 20, 2004 from him to me. Underneath his letter he ‘cuts & pastes’ what appears to be my response to his letter when in truth and in fact I never received this email because his email has been blocked from Enigma’s email account.

This was just another one of his ‘cutting and pasting’ of emails together making it appear as a whole. In reality, I was responding to the “alleged hit man’s wife” who had sent me a taunting Instant Message on my AOL account. Apparently, it made her happy that she had scared me because she sent a copy on to Mr. Atchison. At the time I thought that it was either Mr. Atchison or Mr. Moshein playing one of their sick mind games with me. It is painfully obvious that these people loved to torture me. After this woman logged off, believing that it was either Mr. Atchison or Mr. Moshein, I sent a separate email to LABloodhound and copied it to Mr. Atchison.

(61) Mr. Atchison presented to law enforcement and to this Court several emails which he represented was a true copy of both Mr. Sproul’s and my responses to his emails in regards to the murder for hire plot implicating me (that he and others concocted) First of all, Enigma has blocked its AOL account from receiving any email communication from Mr. Atchison and he knew this. He also knew Mr. Sproul’s personal email address because he had sent letters to him in the past. In view of the serious implications these emails could have ‘ultimately’ achieved --- I could’ve been placed under arrest, thus achieving Mr. Atchison threat to do all that he could to make sure I was locked up behind bars for a very long time. This is very frightening to learn that someone hates so much that they would be willing to do anything to achieve this end.

See Also: http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/affidavit/exhibit044.pdf

(63) Upon examination of Mr. Atchison’s phone records, to the L…’s, it is apparent that from June 17, 2004 at 10:16 AM until 11:25 AM Mr. Atchison attempted to call Patricia … on 12 separate occasions. As the phone logs show on the 13th attempt, at 11:25 AM, Mr. Atchison was successful in making a connection and spoke with either Patricia or John … for approximately 17 minutes. Mr. Atchison appeared to have lost the connection to his call with the L…’s and at 11:43 AM reestablished that connection which lasted approximately 27 minutes longer. From the time of the first call with the L…’s it took one hour (1) and four (4) minutes until Mr. Atchison contacted the Austin Police Department to report that his life was in danger – “The Murder for Hire Plot...”

Considering the time from the first email to the point at which the police were first called one has to wonder, if this was really a true plot to murder Mr. Atchison, why did it take so long? Mr. Atchison’s phone records reflect that on June 17, 2004 at 12:29 PM he contacted the Austin Police Department who sent out a patrol car to his home. Officer Alfredo Delvalle took Mr. Atchison’s statement at 12:36 PM.

See also: http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/affidavit/exhibit049.pdf

Letter Between the Attorneys

According to Mike Newson this document represents the final proposed Settlement Agreement which both Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison were willing to execute.

Seems to us the "alleged" hit man was pretty mad that his con didn't work on Ms. Hamou. It appears that both Bob Atchison and the "alleged hitman" bullied Mike Newson into removing Ms. Hamou's Enigma, Sarskaia and Hamou's websites offline. It appears also that both men were pretty pissed to put it mildly when those sites went back up with all the invoices and emails which we were able to pull most of our information from. It also appears from the evidence that at no time was there a credible threat to murder/harm Bob Atchison just some angry people who believed Ms. Hamou had ripped them off. We at the APO don't believe the evidence supports she did.

From 2003 -2004 Bob filed numerous police reports in Los Angeles and in Austin as well as on a Federal level. In one report it alleges Oma Hamou looked like a Muslim or of Arabic decent and that the reason why she wanted a NGO (Non Governmental Organization) status for Sarskaia under the United Nations was because she wanted to get a ground pass?

QUOTE MIKE NEWSON: The only reason Oma wanted to even attempt to get an NGO status with the UN was because Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein sent letters to the California Attorney General's Office and others informing them basically Oma was a fraud, Enigma had no film project, Sarskaia had no projects in Russia and that Oma was using the name of the church and Alexander Palace as a front to con people out of their money and stuff. Similar to the kind of things alleged against Oma, Enigma and Sarskaia here on this forum by Rob Moshein, Vapors and other associates of Pallasart and of course Bob Atchison.

So at least in one of the police report Bob's complaint isn't just about someone hiring someone to kill him but now is at the very least an attempt to have Oma classified as a potential "terrorist" and that simply by making that accusation it bounced this complaint that she was a terrorist with a huge criminal background to the top of the heap. This report was sent to the Homeland Security Unit which concluded their investigation that Oma Hamou was not a terrorist and the Los Angeles DA rejected prosecuting Bob's complaint against Oma for lack of evidence.

All this because Oma Hamou wanted to make a film about Nicholas II, because she helped some small church in Russia and the Alexander Palace and hope that her projects would continue to promote international goodwill and economic prosperity?

QUOTE MIKE NEWSON: Watchtower of the Mike Newson Blog then says: “BUT this is the best part. That Atchison fellow said that Mike Newson had something to do with Oma Hamou hiring someone to kill him.”

First notice that they have presented some verifiable or presumably verifiable truths in advance of this. Then they present information out of context and sequence as if it were indeed hard fact. This one has been worked to death, still maybe I should take some time to comb back through all that has been said before and put things in the proper time line order and in context. As with all this mess involving the war of words between Oma Hamou and Bob Atchison --- well let me put it this way, when things happened --- that is, the order in which they happened is critical. Something that applies to all things historical. I think that the fact that this whole murder for hire incident was reported to the police, the FBI and Homeland Security and they all dismissed the charges as unfounded --- do you understand what that means Watchtower and Pallasart?

It means (and this is documented) that Bob Atchison conspired and concocted, notice the word concocted, a scheme to get Oma Hamou arrested, What the emails show is talk about someone who claimed Oma had cheated them out of money. This is the same typical M/O from 2003 and carried forward to the present day with Pallasart’s Mike Pyles aka VAPORS.I cooperated with law enforcement, do you not understand what that means? I told them everything I knew and they believed me rather than Bob because the evidence supported what I was saying versus what Bob Atchison was saying. You go ahead and continue to try and convince people otherwise (The Big Lie) but from what I’ve been told those police reports and all the communications are going up and the world itself can judge what Bob Atchison did to Oma Hamou. (Remember this from the first, “when close to being outwitted and exposed, they feign victimhood and turn the focus on themselves - another example of manipulating people through their emotion of guilt, eg sympathy, feeling sorry”?)

Again, according to Bob Atchison/Pallsart we are all supposed to shrug our shoulders at what crimes have been perpetrated on Ms. Hamou by these folks and give them a medal for doing us all a favor!

Again, according to Bob Atchison/Pallsart we are all supposed to shrug our shoulders at what crimes have been perpetrated on Ms. Hamou by these folks and give them a medal for doing us all a favor!

Sources AA Legends, Oma Hamou.com & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/08/you-think-ya-know-but-you-have-no-idea_22.html