Credibilty is the key question here...
Tonight Mike Newson published on AA Legends
OHR BLOG REPORTS: “…A bit of research uncovered a fairly serious document here in the LA Courthouse. Seems that Don Morton (you remember him, the old man Oma Hamou moved in with and then she got an AmEx card in his name and ran up huge bills all without his knowledge or permission...) was SO genuinely afraid of Oma Hamou that he himself (thats what "in pro per" means) went down to the courthouse on August 2, 2002 to file a Request for a Protective Order against Oma Hamou…”
*LAUGHING*perfect example of their investigative journalistic abilities as the documents state that the petition was filed on behalf of the elder Mr. Morton by an attorney not in pro see.
Let’s explore its background to HOW and the WHY this incident came about?
In 2002, according to statements made to the police, Mr. Morton’s son (Randy and wife Edna) was forced to placed their then teenage daughter in a locked down juvenile detention facility in Baja California. To put your child away in this kind of facility costs an enormous amount of money, anywhere from ten to twenty thousand per month.
The son and his family were faced with a financial and emotional crisis and thought that if they moved in with the elder (father) Morton that they could sell their home, pay off some debts and be able to afford those huge monthly payments to the Juvenile Detention facility in Baja.
Oma Hamou had been residing (her children lived with her off and on) with Mr. Morton for six years --- remember Mike Pyles a.k.a. Vapors claimed Oma was living at Mr. Morton’s house by herself yet school records shows that statement is ill researched, or should I say researched to “the best of their ability.” (If you have followed this saga of the war of words between Oma Hamou and Bob Atchison, you may have noticed the trend for “them” to say something is “fact” only to have it shot down in flames as “we” find and release documentation to refute their claims of fact, or even better is when “we” use their own sworn words and documents to show that things are not as they claim…) If you noticed in my last article I pointed out that when Rob Moshein told the courts that he was only reporting what they had researched to “the best of his ability” that they shot him down in flames told him off that, that was not good enough and issued that restraining order.
QUOTE THE COURT: “The court finds and concludes that third party plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of this cause, that a temporary injunction is necessary to prevent harm to Ms. Hamou. That unless injunction lies, third party plaintiffs (ed.: Oma, et. al.) will be without any adequate remedy at law, in that no amount of damages will be able to repair the loss of reputation to the parties.”
Now as to “their” slant and “their” “facts” on this story. It should be pointed out that we do not know if what they say was “told” to them is true or not. “They” on Legends said a lot of things were told them by police and such and yet under oath the police said NO, they never said that. Or like Rob saying on Legends that he had talked to the court reporter and then coming back on Legends to say in effect NO he had not, he just wanted to get to us (harass) as he knew that it was past the end of the business day in Texas and was setting us up? The point of view that I am describing comes from police reports and documentation, with some of the finer points having been filled in by an eye witness. Very soon we will make sure that you can verify all of this by reading the source documents, but for now the lawyers won’t let me… (Oh and as I know how “they” have responded on Legends when we said this, well just remember that we did provide the documents promised when it was the “Appropriate Moment,” quotation by Captain Jack Sparrow. Oma has box, on top of box, filled with all sorts of documents covering many years of events, and I have had the opportunity to ramble through them. You see, to people that she needs/wants to prove things to (like courts and law enforcement) she can…)
Back on track…
Apparently there was a great deal of animosity towards the elder Mr. Morton by his daughter-in-law Edna and her husband because both the elder Morton and his wife choose to do what they wanted with their money without seeking permission from either of their sons. It appears even Edna’s own sister benefited from this generosity at the tune of $30,000, as did so many others including Oma herself.
And up until Mike Pyles came on this forum and published that the elder Morton had gotten a restraining order against Oma, she did not know of its existence. We’ve later learned the elder Morton’s family paid an attorney $2,500.00 to prepare the petition to restrain Oma from further contacting him because at the time the petition was made both Edna and her husband filed a criminal complaint against OMA alleging she had conned the elder Morton out of his money. The police report states there was NO evidence of a crime and goes on to say in the report that the detective personally went over to the residence of the elder Morton and confronted both Edna and the son and told them – case closed.
The statements that Edna and her family moved in with her father-in-law because they wanted to kick Oma out because she was a threat --- well besides the police report that states the elder Morton said that Oma had never been a threat, this document in and of itself backs up the elder Morton’s statement about his son experiencing financial difficulties.
According to the police reports the elder Mr. Morton signed the petition against Oma to, in his words, “keep the peace in the family,” as he was constantly being badgered, especially by his daughter-in-law Edna, about Oma. Shortly after Oma moved out of the elder Morton’s residence the son was appointed “trustee” over his father’s estate, again to keep the peace.
I would imagine that Edna Morton, if she did say all that Bob Atchison, Mike Pyles and Watchtower (Rob Moshein) said she did, that her testimony at best would be offered as “hearsay” and the other side (Oma Hamou’s) being able to prove this woman has bitter feelings towards the elder Morton who didn’t basically give a damn what she or any other family member thought --- he did what he wanted (and his wife) to do with his (their) money.
And the alleged statements made on OHR that are purported to have been made by Edna Morton herself about Oma of having a sexual relationship with the elder Morton? Well can she prove it? The elder Morton himself refuted this allegation (if she did say this) by his own statement (yes it its on record) that his relationship with Oma Hamou was platonic and out of frustration because his sons were badgering him and “threatening” to cut off his salary --- all over his relationship with Oma. He told them, “…if that’s what you want to believe go ahead and have your fantasy…” or the statement that after Oma left the elder Morton’s residence that she had faxed “sexually explicit messages” to him is contrived to say the least. Not to mention that I’ve been told that Mr. Morton didn’t own a fax machine.
If true, which I have my doubts, Edna Morton should refrain from further communicating libelous statements which could result in her being sued and in which will be used against both Pallasart/ Bob Atchison as they've published it as facts. And yes, I have seen hand written letters and such from the elder Morton to Oma, that refutes Rob/Bob/Pallasarts story and backs up Oma’s.
OHR BLOG UPDATED ITS CURRENT BLOG ON MORTON: “I wondered just why so many people were listed with similar sounding names, so I called Edna Morton again. She verified that EVERY SINGLE NAME were all aliases that Oma Hamou was using. The Petition was denied, according to Edna, because the day of the hearing, Don Morton was so senile that he couldn't remember enough evidence to support the petition.”
Ok the police report indicates these names were provided to them by both Edna and her husband which they believed Oma Hamou had/was using. The interesting part of the report states there was no evidence that Ms. Hamou ever used these names. First look at this again and think about it, “the day of the hearing, the elder Morton was so senile that "he couldn't remember enough evidence to support the petition."
This strikes me as funny is it indicates the elder Morton was senile and (so Edna claims) this is why he didn’t show up in court. It just doesn’t jive with what he (the elder Morton) told the police later and their conclusions that the elder Morton was of sound mind (notice not senile) and that they found no evidence of a crime. Now how old is the elder Morton today? I think close to being 95 or 96 maybe now he’s senile but from what I have read and been told he was not back in 2002.
So will the court believe the findings of law enforcement concerning Edna and her husband’s complaint against Oma, or will they believe Bob Atchison, a person who has been shown to have a track record of lying and forging documents, or how about Rob Moshein who perjured himself in the previous litigation or Pallasart’s Mike Pyles who has been caught in some major whoppers?
One more interesting but sad commentary with respect to the elder Morton, he seems to blame Edna for his son’s past bout with alcoholism and he described her as being a rather high-strung woman who seemed to liked to yell for no reason. He (the elder Morton) believed this may have contributed to his granddaughter’s problems at home. He himself has expressed that he can’t stand the hollering and prefers to spend the majority of his time spent locked inside his bathroom reading “Urantia” because in the bathroom he finds solace.
OHR BLOG: “…Now, a protective order would be bad enough, but the REALLY creepy part is that Oma Hamou was using all these alias names…”
No, the really creepy part is that Bob Atchison forged documents and gave them to the police in their investigation on his “bogus” criminal complaints against Oma and thought it would fly. No, the really creepy part is that Bob Atchison was so anxious to achieve his victory (soon short lived) over Oma that he was willing to get up on the stand and lie, and contrived to get his attorney to back him up. No the really creepy part is that Bob Atchison/Pallasart’s people go out of their way to harm Oma --- all because they believe what he says. No the really creepy part is having some whacko come to your home/work and throw you up against wall all because he believed what Bob said about you ripping off some priest or having some whacko put your social security number and home address on the web. No the really creepy part is having someone get a copy of your California DMV information. No the really creepy part is knowing that someone hates you so much that they are willing to fabricate evidence just to make certain you go to jail for crimes they believe you committed. No the really creepy part is how Pallasart/Bob Atchison continuously stalk, harass and threaten and so on.
Now let’s address the allegations made by WATCHTOWER on the Mike Newson Blog:
“…On May 1, 2003, Oma Hamou's company "Engima Films, Inc." has "all rights and privileges SUSPENDED by the State of California Franchise Tax Board for not paying its taxes. On November 8, 2004, Oma Hamou's company "Sarsakia Foundation" had "all rights and privileges" SUSPENDED by the State of California Franchise Tax Board for not paying its taxes. Now, both these companies were not re-instated until May 2005. Yet, we know from the press releases and internet archive pages of Sarskaia and Oma Hamou that SHE continued to "do business" throughout that entire time..”
There’s a HUGE difference in trying to compare what Pallasart has been doing for almost a year to Oma’s companies. First this issue was addressed in the previous lawsuit by Oma’s attorney as both Pallasart and Rob Moshein attempted to have the claims against them by Enigma/Sarskaia dismissed on the basis that it wasn’t recognized as a legitimate corporate entity.
Once Oma became aware of the problem she worked closely with the California Franchise Tax Board (which is documented, as is the fact that California was negligent in informing Oma of the delinquent taxes and forms, and her business had no income during that period) and the matter was resolved. As for Pallasart, their charter was yanked away back in 2004 and for more than 6 months they were doing business as normal despite being told they were operating fraudulently. On the advisement of their then attorney (in the previous litigation) the corporation was made whole again. In 2005 Pallasart was sent notification by the State of Texas about its corporate status, which it choose to ignore, which resulted in the state once again yanking its charter away. Its been more than six months and I myself have pointed this out on this forum, which resulted in Rob standing on his usual soap box saying Pallasart can’t be sued because of its then present status and calling me a liar saying unlike California if a company doesn’t pay its taxes it can still do business. Well if you followed the past articles then you will know that once again I proved that he was wrong:
Texas Laws:
§ 171.315. USE OF CORPORATE NAME AFTER REVIVAL OF CHARTER OR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY. If a corporation's charter or certificate of authority is forfeited under this chapter by the secretary of state and if the corporation requests the secretary to set aside the forfeiture under Section 171.313 of this code, the corporation shall determine from the secretary whether the corporation's name is available for use. If the name is not available, the corporation shall amend its charter or certificate to change its name.
Notice that the very name of the corporation was taken away if it’s charter was forfeited….
So if the name of the corporation was taken away, how could they continue to do business in the name of the corporation? Not to mention that Texas law said that they no longer had the right to conduct business as normal for Pallasart, Inc.? And if so, why did they continue to do so ignoring the law?
Remember when, …
Remember when Rob issued threats on this forum to me that he was going to call my wife and tell her that I was with Oma? As if to imply that I was having an affair with Oma? Let’s put it this way, I’ve been married to my wife now for over 32 years, and she has never had any reason to not trust me to continue to be her partner for the rest of our lives. It seems that “they” are back on this track again as from the recent posts made on the Mike Newson Blog they quote from several different emails from the “alleged hit man’s” wife addressed to me, if her letter is at all credible given the set of circumstances surrounding why that letter was sent in the first place. Also given the propensity of forging documents we really don’t know if she in fact really did send that letter, so taken as a totality let’s put in its proper context. Law enforcement was provided with this document along with others “allegedly” sent to Bob/Rob from the alleged hit man and his wife and found the documents in of themself not credible based on all the other evidence. One has to look at the fact that at the time of that letter all efforts possible were being made to get me to abandon Oma and pull down her web sites, as Bob personally believed and told me on the phone that he felt that it was only because of me that Oma still existed, as if it were not for her web sites that she would have been gone.
The OHR Blog concludes by listing purported aliases used by Oma and by saying: Yeah, she sounds really credible.
Well Yes the courts did believe OMA HAMOU when she asked for a restraining order against Pallasart's Oma Hamou Report dot org site and Rob Moshein and got it, law enforcement did believe OMA HAMOU when it investigated both Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein's many allegations against her, law enforcement did believe OMA HAMOU and Not Bob Atchison or Rob Moshein or Mike Pyles --- so yeah, the people who count found her pretty credible!
So will the court believe the findings of law enforcement concerning Edna and her husband’s complaint against Oma, or will they believe Bob Atchison, a person who has been shown to have a track record of lying and forging documents, or how about Rob Moshein who perjured himself in the previous litigation or Pallasart’s Mike Pyles who has been caught in some major whoppers?
One more interesting but sad commentary with respect to the elder Morton, he seems to blame Edna for his son’s past bout with alcoholism and he described her as being a rather high-strung woman who seemed to liked to yell for no reason. He (the elder Morton) believed this may have contributed to his granddaughter’s problems at home. He himself has expressed that he can’t stand the hollering and prefers to spend the majority of his time spent locked inside his bathroom reading “Urantia” because in the bathroom he finds solace.
OHR BLOG: “…Now, a protective order would be bad enough, but the REALLY creepy part is that Oma Hamou was using all these alias names…”
No, the really creepy part is that Bob Atchison forged documents and gave them to the police in their investigation on his “bogus” criminal complaints against Oma and thought it would fly. No, the really creepy part is that Bob Atchison was so anxious to achieve his victory (soon short lived) over Oma that he was willing to get up on the stand and lie, and contrived to get his attorney to back him up. No the really creepy part is that Bob Atchison/Pallasart’s people go out of their way to harm Oma --- all because they believe what he says. No the really creepy part is having some whacko come to your home/work and throw you up against wall all because he believed what Bob said about you ripping off some priest or having some whacko put your social security number and home address on the web. No the really creepy part is having someone get a copy of your California DMV information. No the really creepy part is knowing that someone hates you so much that they are willing to fabricate evidence just to make certain you go to jail for crimes they believe you committed. No the really creepy part is how Pallasart/Bob Atchison continuously stalk, harass and threaten and so on.
Now let’s address the allegations made by WATCHTOWER on the Mike Newson Blog:
“…On May 1, 2003, Oma Hamou's company "Engima Films, Inc." has "all rights and privileges SUSPENDED by the State of California Franchise Tax Board for not paying its taxes. On November 8, 2004, Oma Hamou's company "Sarsakia Foundation" had "all rights and privileges" SUSPENDED by the State of California Franchise Tax Board for not paying its taxes. Now, both these companies were not re-instated until May 2005. Yet, we know from the press releases and internet archive pages of Sarskaia and Oma Hamou that SHE continued to "do business" throughout that entire time..”
There’s a HUGE difference in trying to compare what Pallasart has been doing for almost a year to Oma’s companies. First this issue was addressed in the previous lawsuit by Oma’s attorney as both Pallasart and Rob Moshein attempted to have the claims against them by Enigma/Sarskaia dismissed on the basis that it wasn’t recognized as a legitimate corporate entity.
Once Oma became aware of the problem she worked closely with the California Franchise Tax Board (which is documented, as is the fact that California was negligent in informing Oma of the delinquent taxes and forms, and her business had no income during that period) and the matter was resolved. As for Pallasart, their charter was yanked away back in 2004 and for more than 6 months they were doing business as normal despite being told they were operating fraudulently. On the advisement of their then attorney (in the previous litigation) the corporation was made whole again. In 2005 Pallasart was sent notification by the State of Texas about its corporate status, which it choose to ignore, which resulted in the state once again yanking its charter away. Its been more than six months and I myself have pointed this out on this forum, which resulted in Rob standing on his usual soap box saying Pallasart can’t be sued because of its then present status and calling me a liar saying unlike California if a company doesn’t pay its taxes it can still do business. Well if you followed the past articles then you will know that once again I proved that he was wrong:
Texas Laws:
§ 171.315. USE OF CORPORATE NAME AFTER REVIVAL OF CHARTER OR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY. If a corporation's charter or certificate of authority is forfeited under this chapter by the secretary of state and if the corporation requests the secretary to set aside the forfeiture under Section 171.313 of this code, the corporation shall determine from the secretary whether the corporation's name is available for use. If the name is not available, the corporation shall amend its charter or certificate to change its name.
Notice that the very name of the corporation was taken away if it’s charter was forfeited….
So if the name of the corporation was taken away, how could they continue to do business in the name of the corporation? Not to mention that Texas law said that they no longer had the right to conduct business as normal for Pallasart, Inc.? And if so, why did they continue to do so ignoring the law?
Remember when, …
Remember when Rob issued threats on this forum to me that he was going to call my wife and tell her that I was with Oma? As if to imply that I was having an affair with Oma? Let’s put it this way, I’ve been married to my wife now for over 32 years, and she has never had any reason to not trust me to continue to be her partner for the rest of our lives. It seems that “they” are back on this track again as from the recent posts made on the Mike Newson Blog they quote from several different emails from the “alleged hit man’s” wife addressed to me, if her letter is at all credible given the set of circumstances surrounding why that letter was sent in the first place. Also given the propensity of forging documents we really don’t know if she in fact really did send that letter, so taken as a totality let’s put in its proper context. Law enforcement was provided with this document along with others “allegedly” sent to Bob/Rob from the alleged hit man and his wife and found the documents in of themself not credible based on all the other evidence. One has to look at the fact that at the time of that letter all efforts possible were being made to get me to abandon Oma and pull down her web sites, as Bob personally believed and told me on the phone that he felt that it was only because of me that Oma still existed, as if it were not for her web sites that she would have been gone.
The OHR Blog concludes by listing purported aliases used by Oma and by saying: Yeah, she sounds really credible.
Well Yes the courts did believe OMA HAMOU when she asked for a restraining order against Pallasart's Oma Hamou Report dot org site and Rob Moshein and got it, law enforcement did believe OMA HAMOU when it investigated both Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein's many allegations against her, law enforcement did believe OMA HAMOU and Not Bob Atchison or Rob Moshein or Mike Pyles --- so yeah, the people who count found her pretty credible!
Photo Source: OmaHamou.com
posted by Sandman at 10:27 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home