Sunday, January 13, 2008

REVISED EDITION OMA HAMOU REALITY: "...we asked Google to confirm if any personal information regarding this blog and our account had been turned over to or even been requested by any law enforcement agency. The answer is a resounding NO. Google has NOT even been asked, nor disclosed any information about us at all. If they "had" been, we would have been notified, we weren't. The only way they "would have" is only by Court Order, and we still would have been notified. We weren't. In other words, this is a major WHOPPER! a Double Whopper, with cheese, the "sources" are WRONG or LYING and "Sandman" keeps repeating these falsehoods KNOWING they're false..."

According to the F.B.I it never compromises any of its investigations or sensitive techniques used by the FBI during undercover investigations.

UPDATE: The point is, there are numerous ways that law enforcement agencies have in finding out the idenity of the cowards who hide behind anonymous names that said, one stands amazed at the sheer guts of those behind the blog, Oma Hamou Reality. When people can hide behind a phony name they are emboldened and the judgment they might use in e-mail is lost. Particularly problematic are behaviors like pedophilia, harrassment or stalking to name but a few. The first can connect the idiot to behavior that is widely objectionable and the second can result in investigations and possible criminal charges.

Unnamed writing is responsible for some of the worst internet vices: intemperate “flaming” of opponents, bullying, dishonesty and a general coarsening of language and incivility. Not to mention self-congratulation and score-settling. People like the men responsible for the creation of the Oma Hamou Report, The Tangled Affais of Enigma, Hamou and Sarskaia websites and the blog, Oma Hamou Reality behave badly when they think they are invisible. The statements often published on the blog, Oma Hamou Reality as I've pointed out are wrong, incorrect, inaccurate, made up, misguided, fabricated, delusional and just not true.

Masked balls were an opportunity for licentious behaviour in a buttoned-down society because (supposedly) no one knew who was who. People who would not dream of being rude in day-to-day transactions feel no such constraints behind the wheel, because the four walls of the car offer the illusion of anonymity; in my experience, drivers with tinted windows are far more aggressive than those without.

T. S.Eliot favoured anonymity in reviewing, but conceded that “some things are permissible when they appear over one's name which become tasteless eccentricity and unseemly violence when unsigned.” That eccentricity and freedom are what attract some to the blogosphere, but just as many people, I suspect, are deterred from joining in by the unseemly violence that too often accompanies anonymity. The information superhighway is still a place of thrilling high-speed argument-chases with little policing, but one way to cut down on road rage and establish some sort of highway code is to encourage named drivers while sceptically steering clear of anonymous road hogs like those on the blog, Oma Hamou Reality who drive with one hand on the horn. With that said, is it possible the information told to me by those close to Oma Hamou that law enforcement know the idenity of the author of the blog, Oma Hamou Reality and that the person is close to Bob Atchison is true? Yes.

To the folks over on Oma Hamou Reality blog: Stalking is a crime, harassing someone is a crime, registering under a different name and pretending to be the person your stalking is a crime and the people who did this obviously had malice in mind when they created those false profiles. Pretending to be someone else so you can stalk your victim is a crime, forging documents is a crime, conspiracy is a crime, fraud is a crime, lying to the police is a crime, conspiring to harm someone because you don't like them is a crime, tax evasion is a crime, harassment is a crime and what they've done to Oma they did out of hate, that makes this a hate crime. How is it possible that we can arrest men for showing up to a house with the "intent" of having sex without actually causing any damage to a person and others who do things as what has been done to Oma get to walk around free like it isn't a big deal?

The record thus far points more in favor of Oma Hamou telling the truth than it does to Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein. Like others, I believe there are a lot of reasons people should know about the men who operate a web site called the Alexander Palace Time Machine and what they are capable of doing. There's the shaming and accountability side of things. And protection of the community: They could do this to kids.

Let's for a moment take a look at what Rob Moshein wrote on Anastasia Davis's History Forum, "AA Legends of Anastasia:"


Quote Rob Moshein: Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:12 pm

"...Sigh, poor delusional Oma/Michelle (and where IS miss justine?) ….AND, why isit that the VERY nice lady court reporter told me that no one, I repeat NO ONE has asked for Court transcripts of the trial you lost or related hearings?? Hmmmm??? Glad to provide the name and phone to anyone who emails me from a real address. given the typical hysteria Oma goes thru, no need to subjet the poor woman, but then IF the real court reporter HAD been contacted, well you would know her anyway, right OMA? ta ta psycho sockpuppets..."

Notice the similar flavour and style comparable to the blog Oma Hamou Reality as it has a similar rhythm to that of a malicious stalker. On the 8th of September, 2006 the REAL COURT REPORTER in Case No: GN303141 Atchison v. Hamou affixed her signature to an affidavit that further supports my opinion of Rob Moshein being a lying liar.

Photobucket

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home