The Credibility of Bob Atchison

"...Knowing all that he has done during these last 8 years how can anyone trust what he has to say about any subject matter when he doesn't tell the truth on a witness stand or to law enforcement?..."

Oma Hamou's statement about Bob Atchison

http://omahamou.com/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=21&start=60

Dr. Ivan P. Sautov The Real Hero of the Alexander Palace Not Bob Atchison!

Today Oma Hamou posted this statement on her forum:

It seems there are a number of movements concerning Nicholas II with a cult like following and National Geographic is interested in this aspect of my story with Bob Atchison and his Alexander Palace Time Machine.

I contacted National Geographic to ask why their organization would ask a person like Bob Atchison, who is not a degreed historian, to verify information for someone of National Geographic’s standing concerning the bones found in Pigs Meadow.


I did not tell N.G. they should not do business with Bob Atchison, unlike what he did to me, nor did I present MY conclusions, I simply told them the raw facts, which do speak for themselves.

I was informed N.G. does not have an existing contract with him. I learned that many years ago Bob contacted them concerning his website, the Alexander Palace Time Machine and his crusade to save the Alexander Palace in Russia.


I related to them that despite what Bob Atchison may have told them, he was not the catalyst in getting a museum established inside the Alexander Palace which is currently being occupied by the Russian Baltic Fleet. I told them of the heroic efforts and action of Dr. Ivan Petrovich Sautov and other Russians who were responsible for saving the Alexander Palace and that they, not Bob Atchison were able to convinced their government, to allow a museum to exist inside of this palace.


I told them of Dr. Sautov's plea to the World Bank and other organizations to save the Alexander Palace which dialogue still exists today unbeknownst to Bob Atchison and his ilk. '



I informed them that Bob Atchison is banned from entering inside the Alexander Palace because of his deceptions and mayhem he caused there in the past – I told them how the officials in Russia told me that they believe Bob Atchison to be a thief as he returned to Austin, Texas with a Russian State artifact. I told them how he claimed the artifact was given to him by the curator of the museum and when she denied his story --- he accused her of lying. Based on my own personal experience, as validated by his behavior recently at court with Bob Atchison I believe the Russians were telling the truth.

I related my experiences with Bob Atchison, amongst other things I told them how he perjured himself in court documents and at trial, how he used forged documents to win his civil lawsuit against me and how he was able to manipulate others including his attorney to harm me. (Because his attorney lied and said there had been an existing lawsuit in the state of Texas between Bob's company and mine, I lost and this has been harmful.)

I told them about my having to file a criminal complaint against him and how he and others boast the police are not taking my complaint seriously because neither Bob or others have heard anything about any criminal investigation. I told them how Bob Atchison and his friends conspired to put me in jail for crimes I did not commit. I told them how Bob and his friends think it is not a big deal to lie and forge documents as the ends justify the means where I am concerned.


I told them Bob Atchison told me the dead spirit of Russia's last Empress, Alexandra and her daughter Olga spoke to him in a dream and told him they did not like me. I told National Geographic the truth. They were interested in obtaining copies of the court record, police record and other documents, all of which I have sent.


Source: http://www.omahamou.com/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4&start=60

Oma Hamou Questions Bob Atchison's Credibility as a Historian

Story developing....

[Excerpts] "...Given my long and painful history with Bob Atchison and his friends and their painfully cruel and deceptive methods, it pains me to see them blindsided a whole new audience with their pretended conscientious and integrity. They made a career out of sabotaging my life and my life’s work and now I am in a unique and unfortunate position of knowing these individuals better than anyone ever wanted too. I don’t have any inclination of allowing them to get away with deceiving the public or attacking some other innocent person.

I read on Bob Atchison’s site the Alexander Palace Time Machine Forum that National Geographic has asked him to validate the accuracy of their upcoming story on the bones of the last of the Russian Czar’s family. In that Bob Atchison’s qualifications are an advanced standing hobbyist and webmaster this makes me wonder why they would consider him over real degreed historians such as but not limited too, Peter Kurth, Dr. Ivan Petrovich Sautov of the Tsarskoe Selo National Museum in St. Petersburg Russia or Boris Romanov who also lives in Russia?

Bob Atchison’s veracity has been recently called into question during a recent civil trial wherein he perjured himself and used forged documents in order to win. Notice the comparison between his written testimony and his verbal testimony here…And compare his sworn statement with the State of Texas’s records here … And compare his statements to law enforcement...


This leads me to believe he lacks credibility as a verifier for National Geographic or any other publication and wonder if Bob is given credit in any article if that would not lead to readers wondering about the validity of the article itself?

Source: http:www.OmaHamou.com/Oma

Mike Newson: I have not had sex with Oma Hamou

Today on OmaHamou.com Mike Newson posted:

OK let’s look at a few things here:

First I commented, to “Frank,

“From your earlier comments it seems that you understand that Bob lied under oath, and committed perjury as you said, “O.k you've proven Bob used forged documents and lie in court to win….” Yet you said that, “Bob Atchison is a good person.” so does this mean that you personally endorse lying to the courts? Is what you are saying that “your” hero uses lies and deception and yet you think this is acceptable behavior?”

And it seems as if the response was, “Bob has spoken the truth about Oma who cares about his lawsuit, I don't, no one does,” So I guess this does mean that Frank approves and endorses lying to the court and lying in general (the ends justify the means), so if that is the case we now know how he thinks and who he is inside. What I don’t get is that we have shown point after point, (and Sandman archived all of this on to his blog) where Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein, et. al. were wrong, misstated, drew the wrong conclusion, lied, made it up, or just plain committed libel, depending on the point.

The few points of fact in their story have been acknowledged, and even then most of these facts about Oma Hamou’s past that are “negative” have been explained in such a manner that most people in the world today understand the circumstances and are willing to make allowances. When we did make a mistake in recollection, or misunderstood something, all of us who have defended Oma have acknowledged that and corrected it.

For the most part, with some exceptions when exceptionally provoked, our responses have been calm, measured and logical. We have pointed out the errors using documented evidence to support out points, (rather than the empty rhetoric that the other side has used) and have shown a trend and tendency in those who hate Oma to use fabrication and a use of propaganda techniques in their methods, and in their attacks.

We have also shown an inability to change their story no matter how many times we correct them, and no matter what the evidence is that we used to show the truth. We have also shown a disregard for the law, an attitude that they are above the law, and a vigilante attitude of being judge, jury, and executioner. The scariest part of the whole story is how people like Frank keep popping up believing with true religious fervor in Bob’s original story.

Are these people real or are some of these people Bob or a close disciple using a fake web alias, as they have in the past? Is the current hate-Oma blog really done by Rob or Bob as the similar writing style and emotional involvement (and such) suggests or is it someone else? The intense emotions that they exhibit that mimic those of Bob/Rob (they are one) make one wonder.

But in reality it does not matter, and in fact it supports Oma’s position in regard to the danger that is represented by Bob that Bob was able to gather people like this to rally round the hate-Oma flag. Also think about the symptoms of a sociopath that we have published from time to time that they tend to stay behind the scenes and control others to do their dirty work, all the while showing to the rest of the world a façade of normalcy and charm.

Last the words that Frank used, would lead one to believe that in spite of his words that he spoke the truth, that actually he personally had not yet seen the “porn” movies of Oma. Thus at the time he wrote, he wrote libel. He said, “I will be posting them here in the next few days (ready Oma for the world to see you like this, I know I am ready…” which to me says that he has not yet seen them, if he had it would not take days to get them and post them.

What is it that drives someone to behave like this? How are some people able to be controlled to do such things. Is this part of a Cult power as we have wondered about in the past, or is this the power of a sociopath?

Oma has said in the past that she was a model, and part and parcel of the modeling world is that one’s body is a tool of the trade. So yes there are photos that show her breasts, her bare back and such. But she tells me that she never did any sex acts, and I believe her. Her hey-day was before the time of the Internet, and as such she suffered even more so the fleeting fame that goes along with modeling. Like a mayfly, the typical model briefly burns bright before their flame is extinguished and the next one’s time comes. And in the days before the Internet existed this was even truer, as once the magazine was tossed, the images were tossed.

And while we are on the subject, I have stated point blank that there has never been any type of sexual activity between Oma and I. I have not had any sexual contact, what so ever, with her let alone committed adultery with her. Not even taking the definition of President Clinton and what he considered sexual contact in mind or any kind of weaseling of any term or in any manner of speaking. Simply put we have not had any type of sexual contact. And as such, given that you knew this as I have stated it previously before and after your posts, I demand an immediate retraction and apology, of your recent distasteful and hurtful comments on what should have been a great day marking a significant achievement in the current world. The evidence in emails that Bob/Rob pass around to substantiate their claim of this activity between Oma and I is malicious and false. It was created in the heat of the moment as leverage to force me into abandoning Oma and leave her to the wolves. I was threatened to have letters delivered to each of my neighbors stating this sexual alliance with Oma if I did not leave her to the “wolves.”

To my dishonor I did abandon her for a time.

That we continued our relationship afterwards and the fact that I remained married for many more years after this event should speak volumes as the falseness of the accusations. “They” continue to use it to day to cause harm, to denigrate me as a viable source of information and to in general cause hurt, in spite of having been informed of the falsity of the claim, a demand to cease and desist and a knowledge of the hurt and damage that they have caused.

I wonder what Frank will do if he can not substantiate his Oma-as-porn-star claims, where does that leave him? What does that say about all of Bob’s story about Oma?

Source: http://omahamou.com/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=21&start=30

Bob Atchison A Hero?

BEFORE AFTER

PHOTOGRAPH AS A RUSSIAN EMPRESS FOR FILM

A MATTER OF HONOR

Today on OmaHamou.com Mike Newson posted:

Frank,

Let me see if I have this right. It appears from your comments here on this site that it does not matter to you and in fact you personally approve of what Rob Moshein /Bob Atchison and all of their friends have done to Oma Hamou over the years including the recent Blogs?

That to you it is a yawning thing of no consequence?

From your earlier comments it seems that you understand that Bob lied under oath, and committed perjury as you said, “O.k you've proven Bob used forged documents and lie in court to win….” Yet you said that, “Bob Atchison is a good person.” so does this mean that you personally endorse lying to the courts?

Is what you are saying that “your” hero uses lies and deception and yet you think this is acceptable behavior?

It seems from what you have said here that you approve of perjury, harassment, libel, slander, making false police reports. and, among other things, inciting others to hate a group of people?You personally have stated as a proven fact that Oma Hamou participated in porn video/films and these flicks are on the web, so I assume that you yourself have personal knowledge of this so that what you said was not libel but the truth?

So of course you will be able to prove your words by sharing the evidence to us?

IF not are you going to retract your words and apologize?

I think it is put up or shut up time. As you seem to believe without reservation the story that Bob has produced over the years, then you are indeed a perfect example that Oma needs to show that even today people are being controlled by what Bob has said, and even more so that Bob is capable of controlling people in the face of massive evidence that he has used lies as tools and weapons to win. Even more consider what you have said and how it reveals who you are inside….

LET'S SUPPORT BILLY!

This kids story touched me...

Please show some support!

Read on... http://www.myspace.com/mslovesbilly

Photo Source: OmaHamou.com (2003)