Oma Hamou Questions Bob Atchison's Credibility as a Historian

Story developing....

[Excerpts] "...Given my long and painful history with Bob Atchison and his friends and their painfully cruel and deceptive methods, it pains me to see them blindsided a whole new audience with their pretended conscientious and integrity. They made a career out of sabotaging my life and my life’s work and now I am in a unique and unfortunate position of knowing these individuals better than anyone ever wanted too. I don’t have any inclination of allowing them to get away with deceiving the public or attacking some other innocent person.

I read on Bob Atchison’s site the Alexander Palace Time Machine Forum that National Geographic has asked him to validate the accuracy of their upcoming story on the bones of the last of the Russian Czar’s family. In that Bob Atchison’s qualifications are an advanced standing hobbyist and webmaster this makes me wonder why they would consider him over real degreed historians such as but not limited too, Peter Kurth, Dr. Ivan Petrovich Sautov of the Tsarskoe Selo National Museum in St. Petersburg Russia or Boris Romanov who also lives in Russia?

Bob Atchison’s veracity has been recently called into question during a recent civil trial wherein he perjured himself and used forged documents in order to win. Notice the comparison between his written testimony and his verbal testimony here…And compare his sworn statement with the State of Texas’s records here … And compare his statements to law enforcement...


This leads me to believe he lacks credibility as a verifier for National Geographic or any other publication and wonder if Bob is given credit in any article if that would not lead to readers wondering about the validity of the article itself?

Source: http:www.OmaHamou.com/Oma