Mike Newson Apologizes to Rob Moshein
UPDATED:
Rob Moshein:
"...Another publicly published example: 7-6-2007: "why can Rob declare his Austin wine business the “Cellar” as bankrupt leaving behind around a half million in debt". While it is true that I did close my wine shop "The Cellar", I have NEVER declared Bankruptcy, either personally nor for my business, nor did I leave anywhere near $500,000 in debt. THIS IS A FALSE STATEMENT AND IS LIBEL PER SE BECAUSE UNDER TEXAS LAW IT IS LIBEL TO ACCUSE SOMEONE OF BANKRUPTCY WHEN SUCH AS NEVER BEEN FILED. Anyone wishing may certainly avail themselves of the public record in Travis County Texas and will not find any Bankruptcy petition filed by me or my business. Does anyone retract or apologize for this blatantly false statement? Of course not..."
Oma Hamou:
”After Judge Livingston issued a restraining order against Rob Moshein on February 14, 2005, I sat at counsel table while my attorney and Mr. Moshein went in the back to talk. Their conversation was told to me by my attorney, Mr. Slater. Rob indicated he wanted to settle the portion of my lawsuit dealing with him as quickly as possible and was willing to work towards that end. I was informed by my attorney Rob had confided to him he owed a large sum of money to his business partner because of their failing business venture. Because it has been 3 years and I no longer am in possession of the file record pertaining to Bob/Rob/Pallasart, I don't specifically recall which company Rob was referring too as at the time he was involved with 2 different entities: the Cellar & Equital Investments, Inc. and according to my attorney, he was on the verge of filing bankruptcy..."
A poster on OmaHamou.com, Snoopy asked:
Mike, I read on Legends the reason why Rob/Bob claim you have committed adultry with Oma is because the alleged hit man's wife told them you had, is this true? Why would these two numbskulls claim because she said so, it must be true, they do claim to be an author, attorney, historian so why make such a claim without evidence. Has the lies written about you affected your life and your family and if so how? I think we all admire your loyalty to your friend, Oma but do you sometimes try to distance yourself from her knowing that these kind of people are out there to destroy you now because of her?
MIKE NEWSON:
If Mr. Moshien says that he did not file bankruptcy, and your comment is the first time that I have heard such a denial and demand for apology then I accept his word and withdraw the comment, and apologize for it. Bankruptcy is not a dishonor, in fact it is a Constitutional Right and I never at any time meant to imply that the act of declaring Bankruptcy was any reason to feel shame.
It was simply the fact that both had left business debt behind, yet for one it was OK, but for the other it was not. It is this inequity that I was trying to point outI was told, according to my recollection of the time, that Rob told this tale to Oma’s lawyer presumably as a reason to be kind to Mr. Moshein while they were first at court, back when the courts told him, “"The court finds and concludes that third party plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of this cause, that a temporary injunction is necessary to prevent harm to Ms. Hamou. That unless injunction lies, third party plaintiffs (ed.: Oma, et. al.) will be without any adequate remedy at law, in that no amount of damages will be able to repair the loss of reputation to the parties.” and it worked --- as the agreement that was drafted up was that Rob and Bob pay $1.00 each and agree to retract what they said about Oma, apologize and stop doing what they had done to Oma, and they at first agreed in principle to this. Later this all fell apart.
In my mind the issue is one that goes much deeper, it is the point that Rob did have a business fail, and while he did not disclose how much debt he owed, “nor did I leave anywhere near $500,000 in debt.” He did, by his word in that quote, leave debt. Yet this has always been a key issue on the website that Rob claimed ownership of. Why is it that it was OK for him, but it made Oma someone who, from the picture they painted, was beneath contempt? According to them her company having debt made her a scammer and someone who one should not do business with and in fact this factor added on to the others which they claimed were real made her into some one that Rob HAD to warn the world about.
As to the claim that I have had sex with Oma I categorically deny any and all allegations that I have had any such relations with her at any time. I have said this before and have previously demanded a cease and desist of such claims, and I also now demand a retraction and apology. I went through this before back when it first happened. I denied it then, I denied it to the so called “hit man” and I deny it now. Am I emotionally attached to Oma? The answer is yes, but there are lines and boundaries. Those lines and boundaries Oma and I have not crossed. One can love someone with out there being a sexual relationship.In many respects the two situations are analogues. In both it is a third party that said that the situation was real. In my case I assumed that what a officer of the court reported represented what Rob had said and was valid, but it is possible that Rob had spoken in hyperbole, under the heat of the moment, which lead to this situation.
As to the other situation “heat of the moment” is not nearly accurate enough. There was plenty of raw emotion flying around, and emotions were raw and much force was applied to cause me to fold. This situation is just one of those levers and threats that was used against me, however their implying it or even saying it, as they have no personal knowledge of any such event happening, (other than an admitted emotional but platonic relationship) does not make the conclusion true and in fact the heat of the situation makes their claims more than suspect.
Yes, my life is no longer the same, I have undergone much hurt and pain simply because of the allegations made against me. However, I have no reason to disbelieve what Oma has claimed, and she indeed backed up her words with documentation. The damage is done, I doubt that I will ever live it down completely and will for the rest of my life be defending myself against this. Have the many times I have been turned down for jobs recently been caused by someone doing a web search on me? I don’t know but at times it is hard to keep going. With that in mind there is no reason to distance myself from Oma, what more could “they” do to me than has already been done? Source: http://omahamou.com/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=18&start=60
We wonder if Rob Moshein will retract and apologize for his blatantly false statements he made about Mike Newson and Oma Hamou?
When people do a web search on Oma Hamou the first sites to come up is Pallasart’s Oma Hamou Report and Miz ThanG, Oma Hamou Reality's blog. Pallasart provides a link to both Oma Hamou Reality blog and Rob Moshein Speaks Out blog. The fact that Oma even attempts to correct what is out there about her on her own forum no less, is something the OHR blog puts down yet it sings Rob Moshein's praises for doing the same thing.
Rob Moshein has admitted he used to own a blog about Oma but don’t anymore and he has published he once owned a website about Oma. Okay, if we were to believe Rob's telling the truth then why on earth would Bob Atchison tell the FBI, US Marhshalls, law enforcement in Texas and in California that he created the website Rob claims he created? Bob's ego is massive and I don't think he was lying to the police, I beleive he created it and Rob took the blame for it. In Oma's published statements she said the police told her Pallasart was behind the OHR blog so I ask why should we the public not believe her when she so far has been able to prove she’s not lying?
The OHR blog claims they are just publishing statements that they've been told by the police, court reporters, people who knew Oma and the public record. Yet when either Mike Newson, Oma Hamou or someone else points out what they've published is incorrect meaning not true and provide proof in the way of dcoumentation the OHR blog has steadfastly refused to retract or offer an apology. They keep repeating cutting and pasting their, "I don't want to lose the forest B.S. which makes them 'legally' accountable for those words. They have come right out and accuse Oma of having committed the crime of such as but not limited too (love the use of that word) kidnapping, identity theft, pornography, fraud and other lieblous actions. We at APO (my blog) have pointed out the link they provide to the California Business Bureau does not rate Enigma (Oma's film company) as a D instead it gives it A. We've been pointing this one fact out to them for years to no avail so there comes a point in this saga when one asks why does the OHR blog sound a bit like it has an axe to grind?
Rob Moshein published a false statement about the reason why Penny Wilson and Greg King shut down the forum part of their website. Oma published what really went down between Rob and his friends and her on the KW forum and it didn’t happen the way Rob said it did. Russophile and Boris Romanov who are participants on this forum (OmaHamou.com) and on the KW forum will tell you, that Rob's statement just doesn't jive with reality. He may believe he has the power to control Ms. Wilson and Greg King on some superficial level but he doesn't and the events he described didn't happen exactly the way he told it. But we've all seen him do this same thing on other public forums and even on his/Bob's Alexander Palace Time Machine forum.
Remember, Bob Atchison is a master manipulator - he had ability to manipulate Rob an attorney by profession to violate a court order, Bob Atchison had the ability to manipulate his own trial attorney who committed perjury because she believed her cleint was telling her the truth, he had the ability to manipulate everyone into believing Hamou hired someone to murder him to end his lawsuit against her, if he could do all this whose to say he isn't manipulating the OHR blog?
I believe Rob Moshein created the OHR blog when he discovered I had started a blog about him and his friends hijacking the Legend of Anastasia forum. I believe he may be telling the truth in that he no longer contributes to the OHR blog and I strongly believe the main culprit behind the blog at this point is Bob Atchison. Oma Hamou has exposed Bob Atchison in a way that he has NEVER BEEN EXPOSED. His lies are naked for all to see it reminds me of the story of the Emperor who wore no clothes. He reigns as the Emperor on his Alexander Palace Time Machine website. He is Master of His domain. I believe Oma is telling the truth. One last thing, the folks over on the OHR blog do read both of my blogs on the Bob Atchison & Oma Hamou Saga as often they've made comments about it. I have published both Mike Newson and Oma Hamou's Cease & Desist letters on both of my blogs but like Rob who seemed to willingly and knowingly violate a court order, and Bob who willing and knowingly committed perjury, conspired with others to put Oma in jail for crimes she has never committed and all sorts of other nasty things I would say the OHR has remained true to form of those on Atchison's team. That is, they don't give a rats bum about how their actions affect and does affect Hamou, actions which under current law, they are going to do whatever it takes to bring Oma Hamou down and whoever else is on her side.
Rob Moshein:
"...Another publicly published example: 7-6-2007: "why can Rob declare his Austin wine business the “Cellar” as bankrupt leaving behind around a half million in debt". While it is true that I did close my wine shop "The Cellar", I have NEVER declared Bankruptcy, either personally nor for my business, nor did I leave anywhere near $500,000 in debt. THIS IS A FALSE STATEMENT AND IS LIBEL PER SE BECAUSE UNDER TEXAS LAW IT IS LIBEL TO ACCUSE SOMEONE OF BANKRUPTCY WHEN SUCH AS NEVER BEEN FILED. Anyone wishing may certainly avail themselves of the public record in Travis County Texas and will not find any Bankruptcy petition filed by me or my business. Does anyone retract or apologize for this blatantly false statement? Of course not..."
Oma Hamou:”After Judge Livingston issued a restraining order against Rob Moshein on February 14, 2005, I sat at counsel table while my attorney and Mr. Moshein went in the back to talk. Their conversation was told to me by my attorney, Mr. Slater. Rob indicated he wanted to settle the portion of my lawsuit dealing with him as quickly as possible and was willing to work towards that end. I was informed by my attorney Rob had confided to him he owed a large sum of money to his business partner because of their failing business venture. Because it has been 3 years and I no longer am in possession of the file record pertaining to Bob/Rob/Pallasart, I don't specifically recall which company Rob was referring too as at the time he was involved with 2 different entities: the Cellar & Equital Investments, Inc. and according to my attorney, he was on the verge of filing bankruptcy..."
A poster on OmaHamou.com, Snoopy asked:
Mike, I read on Legends the reason why Rob/Bob claim you have committed adultry with Oma is because the alleged hit man's wife told them you had, is this true? Why would these two numbskulls claim because she said so, it must be true, they do claim to be an author, attorney, historian so why make such a claim without evidence. Has the lies written about you affected your life and your family and if so how? I think we all admire your loyalty to your friend, Oma but do you sometimes try to distance yourself from her knowing that these kind of people are out there to destroy you now because of her?
MIKE NEWSON:
If Mr. Moshien says that he did not file bankruptcy, and your comment is the first time that I have heard such a denial and demand for apology then I accept his word and withdraw the comment, and apologize for it. Bankruptcy is not a dishonor, in fact it is a Constitutional Right and I never at any time meant to imply that the act of declaring Bankruptcy was any reason to feel shame.
It was simply the fact that both had left business debt behind, yet for one it was OK, but for the other it was not. It is this inequity that I was trying to point outI was told, according to my recollection of the time, that Rob told this tale to Oma’s lawyer presumably as a reason to be kind to Mr. Moshein while they were first at court, back when the courts told him, “"The court finds and concludes that third party plaintiffs have shown a likelihood of success on the merits of this cause, that a temporary injunction is necessary to prevent harm to Ms. Hamou. That unless injunction lies, third party plaintiffs (ed.: Oma, et. al.) will be without any adequate remedy at law, in that no amount of damages will be able to repair the loss of reputation to the parties.” and it worked --- as the agreement that was drafted up was that Rob and Bob pay $1.00 each and agree to retract what they said about Oma, apologize and stop doing what they had done to Oma, and they at first agreed in principle to this. Later this all fell apart.
In my mind the issue is one that goes much deeper, it is the point that Rob did have a business fail, and while he did not disclose how much debt he owed, “nor did I leave anywhere near $500,000 in debt.” He did, by his word in that quote, leave debt. Yet this has always been a key issue on the website that Rob claimed ownership of. Why is it that it was OK for him, but it made Oma someone who, from the picture they painted, was beneath contempt? According to them her company having debt made her a scammer and someone who one should not do business with and in fact this factor added on to the others which they claimed were real made her into some one that Rob HAD to warn the world about.
As to the claim that I have had sex with Oma I categorically deny any and all allegations that I have had any such relations with her at any time. I have said this before and have previously demanded a cease and desist of such claims, and I also now demand a retraction and apology. I went through this before back when it first happened. I denied it then, I denied it to the so called “hit man” and I deny it now. Am I emotionally attached to Oma? The answer is yes, but there are lines and boundaries. Those lines and boundaries Oma and I have not crossed. One can love someone with out there being a sexual relationship.In many respects the two situations are analogues. In both it is a third party that said that the situation was real. In my case I assumed that what a officer of the court reported represented what Rob had said and was valid, but it is possible that Rob had spoken in hyperbole, under the heat of the moment, which lead to this situation.
As to the other situation “heat of the moment” is not nearly accurate enough. There was plenty of raw emotion flying around, and emotions were raw and much force was applied to cause me to fold. This situation is just one of those levers and threats that was used against me, however their implying it or even saying it, as they have no personal knowledge of any such event happening, (other than an admitted emotional but platonic relationship) does not make the conclusion true and in fact the heat of the situation makes their claims more than suspect.
Yes, my life is no longer the same, I have undergone much hurt and pain simply because of the allegations made against me. However, I have no reason to disbelieve what Oma has claimed, and she indeed backed up her words with documentation. The damage is done, I doubt that I will ever live it down completely and will for the rest of my life be defending myself against this. Have the many times I have been turned down for jobs recently been caused by someone doing a web search on me? I don’t know but at times it is hard to keep going. With that in mind there is no reason to distance myself from Oma, what more could “they” do to me than has already been done? Source: http://omahamou.com/oma/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=18&start=60
We wonder if Rob Moshein will retract and apologize for his blatantly false statements he made about Mike Newson and Oma Hamou?
When people do a web search on Oma Hamou the first sites to come up is Pallasart’s Oma Hamou Report and Miz ThanG, Oma Hamou Reality's blog. Pallasart provides a link to both Oma Hamou Reality blog and Rob Moshein Speaks Out blog. The fact that Oma even attempts to correct what is out there about her on her own forum no less, is something the OHR blog puts down yet it sings Rob Moshein's praises for doing the same thing.
Rob Moshein has admitted he used to own a blog about Oma but don’t anymore and he has published he once owned a website about Oma. Okay, if we were to believe Rob's telling the truth then why on earth would Bob Atchison tell the FBI, US Marhshalls, law enforcement in Texas and in California that he created the website Rob claims he created? Bob's ego is massive and I don't think he was lying to the police, I beleive he created it and Rob took the blame for it. In Oma's published statements she said the police told her Pallasart was behind the OHR blog so I ask why should we the public not believe her when she so far has been able to prove she’s not lying?
The OHR blog claims they are just publishing statements that they've been told by the police, court reporters, people who knew Oma and the public record. Yet when either Mike Newson, Oma Hamou or someone else points out what they've published is incorrect meaning not true and provide proof in the way of dcoumentation the OHR blog has steadfastly refused to retract or offer an apology. They keep repeating cutting and pasting their, "I don't want to lose the forest B.S. which makes them 'legally' accountable for those words. They have come right out and accuse Oma of having committed the crime of such as but not limited too (love the use of that word) kidnapping, identity theft, pornography, fraud and other lieblous actions. We at APO (my blog) have pointed out the link they provide to the California Business Bureau does not rate Enigma (Oma's film company) as a D instead it gives it A. We've been pointing this one fact out to them for years to no avail so there comes a point in this saga when one asks why does the OHR blog sound a bit like it has an axe to grind?
Rob Moshein published a false statement about the reason why Penny Wilson and Greg King shut down the forum part of their website. Oma published what really went down between Rob and his friends and her on the KW forum and it didn’t happen the way Rob said it did. Russophile and Boris Romanov who are participants on this forum (OmaHamou.com) and on the KW forum will tell you, that Rob's statement just doesn't jive with reality. He may believe he has the power to control Ms. Wilson and Greg King on some superficial level but he doesn't and the events he described didn't happen exactly the way he told it. But we've all seen him do this same thing on other public forums and even on his/Bob's Alexander Palace Time Machine forum.
Remember, Bob Atchison is a master manipulator - he had ability to manipulate Rob an attorney by profession to violate a court order, Bob Atchison had the ability to manipulate his own trial attorney who committed perjury because she believed her cleint was telling her the truth, he had the ability to manipulate everyone into believing Hamou hired someone to murder him to end his lawsuit against her, if he could do all this whose to say he isn't manipulating the OHR blog?
I believe Rob Moshein created the OHR blog when he discovered I had started a blog about him and his friends hijacking the Legend of Anastasia forum. I believe he may be telling the truth in that he no longer contributes to the OHR blog and I strongly believe the main culprit behind the blog at this point is Bob Atchison. Oma Hamou has exposed Bob Atchison in a way that he has NEVER BEEN EXPOSED. His lies are naked for all to see it reminds me of the story of the Emperor who wore no clothes. He reigns as the Emperor on his Alexander Palace Time Machine website. He is Master of His domain. I believe Oma is telling the truth. One last thing, the folks over on the OHR blog do read both of my blogs on the Bob Atchison & Oma Hamou Saga as often they've made comments about it. I have published both Mike Newson and Oma Hamou's Cease & Desist letters on both of my blogs but like Rob who seemed to willingly and knowingly violate a court order, and Bob who willing and knowingly committed perjury, conspired with others to put Oma in jail for crimes she has never committed and all sorts of other nasty things I would say the OHR has remained true to form of those on Atchison's team. That is, they don't give a rats bum about how their actions affect and does affect Hamou, actions which under current law, they are going to do whatever it takes to bring Oma Hamou down and whoever else is on her side.
posted by Sandman at 8:06 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home