Wednesday, May 30, 2007

A History of Violence...

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

UPDATE

1) Did you know that had Marcus Demian followed through on his representations to the court Oma Hamou would have never been convicted of any crime in any State?

In one of several letters to the court Marcus Demian’s attorney writes:

[Excerpts] “…Mr. Demian stated to me that although he and his wife have experienced marital difficulties in the past, they are now firmly reconciled. Mr. Demian has authorized me to represent to you and the court …that he is …willing to make arrangements with the banks and prosecutors in Utah and Montana in order to make restitution on behalf of his wife…"

2) Did you know on December 17, 1990 Marcus Demian had his then wife, Oma write a check to pay for their airline flight from Cody, Wyoming to Los Angeles, California and the check was secured by his AMEX?

3) Did you know in more than one marriage of Marcus Demian there is a history of guns, drugs, and violence?

4) Did you know Marcus Demian “almost” succeeded in killing 2 of his wives that we know of and while inflicting "great bodily injure" to one of the wives killed his unborn child?
5) Did you know that because of Marcus Demian 2 of his wives went to jail and so did someone else?
6) Did you know Oma Hamou was so afraid her husband would make good on his threats of harm that she asked the courts permission, with respect to the children, to hide her child in a different state?
7) Did you know Marcus Demian can be prosecuted for "crimes" he committed in the State of California?

Something to think about....
Source: Internet archives OmaHamou.com

Labels:

Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein are lying liars...

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket


UPDATE
Reporting as a fact
OMA HAMOU REALITY BLOG states:

1997

July 9: According to the Sand Diego Sherrif's office, Oma Hamou was arrested again in San Diego as a Felony Fugitive from Justice for violation of her Montana probation. San Diego Case CD129280. She was jailed for one month until extradited back to Yellowstone County, Billings, Montana on August 15. She paid the required restitution in Montana and was released.
YET THE ACTUAL COURT RECORD REFLECTS HAMOU WAS NEVER
EXTRADITED TO THE STATE OF MONTANA:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket


Hence once again demonstrating Oma Hamou has been truthful in revealing information about her criminal convictions and proving Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein are only interested in their single minded campaign of harassment and intimidation.

Borrowing a word that the folks over on that other blog like to use:

"...Given their paranoia and false premise on just this one issue, I suggest you take the rest of their statements with the same required truckload of salt. What does the fact that they can only attack those people as a response to addressing this REALITY tell you? I know what it tells us..."

UPDATE: When one reads a person has been arrested and extradited to a different state the image conjured up is a "prisoner in chains" and no matter how the folks over on that other blog attempts to put a spin on it, this is the image they want you to see.

ADDITIONAL INFO: According to Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein/Pallasart they claim in 1991 Oma Hamou was arrested in Billings, Montana using the name Oma Hamou. Yet police records from Montana show Oma was never arrested in 1991 using the name of Hamou and according to Oma herself in a published statement made on her forum she writes she "...didn't meet anyone by the name of Hamou until 1994..."

A simple Google search provides countless examples of absolutely horrifying cases where individuals have had their lives destroyed as a result of a psycho who lives to harass people on the Internet. It is absolutely reprehensible for someone to be able to come up with false, malicious and defamatory information about someone with the intent of destroying their character, and be able to do so with impunity and anonymity.

Source: http://www.omahamou.com/PDF/OmaHamouLetterBobAtchison81306.pdf

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Did Hamou Really Hire someone to kill Bob Atchison???

UPDATE
Justin Edwards wrote:
Recently Oma Hamou's ex Husband told her he knew all about her attempt to murder Bob Atchison let's examine the real facts behind Atchison's allegation.

For 5 1/2 years, Rob Moshein/ Bob Atchison/ and Bob's web company, Pallasart concocted many lies and schemes which they told to law enforcement agencies in both California & Texas and others such as but not limited to the FBI, Homeland Security, U.S. Marshalls and the U.S. State Department "hoping" someone would believe what they were saying about Oma and toss her ass in jail. After having "thoroughly" investigated the claims made against Oma Hamou law enforcement realized it was a bunch of bullshit made up by a group of sociopaths who held a vendetta.

Bob Atchison claims Oma Hamou hired someone to kill him because he filed a civil law suit against her and believed if she killed him, the law suit would go away. But when the police took Bob Atchison's phone records and the phone records of the alleged hitman and compared dates and time they discovered Bob Atchison contacted the "alleged" hit man first and the first email sent to Bob Atchison by the alleged hit man didn't say anything about Oma Hamou hiring or wanting to hurt anyone.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

And no the Austin police department never called Bob Atchison even though he swears up and down they did, they didn't. Take a look for yourself at Bob Atchison's phone records and you'll see he contacted the police first to report he got a call (key words: got a call) from someone who claimed he was hired to kill him and the Austin Police Department dispatcher sent out a patrol car out to his home.

According to sources, to this day Bob Atchison claims he is a victim...poor baby give that man a box of tissue cause he's going to need it when they put his ass inside a jail cell next to some guy named BUBBA :-)



Image Hosted by ImageShack.us



UPDATE:

When Bob Atchison received the below eMail from the "alleged" Hitman's wife he sent back a reply and requested a telephone number – obviously she provided it to him but we simply don’t know how it happened because Mr. Atchison never provided Oma's attorney with the information. The next communication sent is later that same evening where (again) Bob Atchison selectively ‘cuts & pasts’ from an email sent to him by "Patricia" the alleged hitman's wife.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Reviewing Bob Atchison's phone records it is apparent that from June 17, 2004 at 10:16 AM until 11:25 AM Bob attempted to call Patricia … on 12 separate occasions. As the phone logs show on the 13th attempt, at 11:25 AM, he was successful in making a connection and spoke with someone for approximately 17 minutes. Then it appears he lost the connection and at 11:43 AM reestablished that connection which lasted approximately 27 minutes longer.

Considering the time from the first email to the point at which the police were first called one has to wonder, if this was really a true plot to murder Bob, why did it take so long?

Bob Atchison’s phone records reflect that on June 17, 2004 at 12:29 PM he contacted the Austin Police Department who sent out a patrol car to his home.

An Officer Alfredo Delvalle took Mr. Atchison’s statement at 12:36 PM.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket



Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket



Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Atchison's Attorney and Hamou's discusses the Atchison's
Murder for Hire Scheme

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Source: Texas Case Case No. GN303141 - Affidavit of Oma Hamou & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/bob-atchisons-plots-against-oma-hamou.html & http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/on-aa-legends-mike-newson-postedthings.html

READ ROB MOSHEIN'S PLEADINGS: http://omahamou.com/PDF/RobMosheinRequestSummary.pdf &
http://omahamou.com/PDF/HAMOUANSWERMOSHEINSUMMARY.PDF

Photo Source: OmaHamou.com





















Monday, May 28, 2007

Did Oma Hamou Kidnap A Child?

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Did Oma Hamou Kidnap A Child?

UPDATE

OmaHamouReality Blog reports as a fact:

[Excerpts] "...Late 1990: Oma Hamou has published on the internet documents and statements supporting her "running away" from her "abusive" Husband Demian. She admits taking "children" with her... Oma Hamou clearly has no regard for authority or proper legal channels, as evidenced by her own actions. See? Rather than turn to proper legal channels who were already involved, Oma Hamou KIDNAPPED A CHILD SHE HAD NO LEGAL AUTHORITY OVER NOR LEGAL RIGHT TO TAKE. She had only been married for SIX MONTHS to Marcus Demain, yet absconded with HIS child without authority to do so. Oma Hamou will tell you that "the ends justify the means" that she was "protecting" the child when she kidnapped him..."

According to OmaHamou.com, Oma Hamou and Marcus Demian had been together for 4 years.
Law enforcement in the State of Montana confirmed Oma Hamou never “kidnapped” Marcus Demian’s children, thus debunking yet another claim made by the folks over on that other blog. In 1990, according to law enforcement in Montana Marcus Demian kidnapped his own children from their mother and wouldn’t give me any other information citing anything having to do with children was protected by the State.

Hamou herself talks about this incident by pointing out in the midst of domestic upheaval the courts gave custody of Demian’s two small children to their biological mother. When the Sherriff delivered the children to their mother and Hamou they were told to get out of Dodge as fast as they could because Marcus Demian was mad as hell and gunning for bear.

Hamou claims she hid the children, their mother and her own small child in a different city until Demian found out where she was hiding them. Waiting for Hamou to leave the apartment Demian convinces his ex-wife to travel to the State of California with their children there he explained the State of Montana would cease to have jurisdiction. Days later according to Hamou Demian travels to California but he's not alone he is accompanied by a man who he hires to impersonate a police officer.

This “police officer” tells the biological mother that he is there to arrest her and Demian ends up kidnapping the children taking them back to Montana. Once he is in Montana his vehicle is surrounded at gun point by law enforcement and the children are placed in foster care.

AFTERMATH: The man who impersonated a police officer is arrested pleads guilty while Demian himself keeps his distance and maintains he had nothing to do with it. The biological mother is considered to be dead and according to Hamou to this day, Demian maintains his actions were heroic. According to Mike Newson, Hamou has the arrest record of the man Demian hired to impersonate an officer as well as the canceled check which was issued by Marcus Demian. Both Newson and Justin Edwards claim at no time has anyone from Team Hamou published the name of Demian's son, therefore one has to conclude this information was provided by Marcus Demian.

MARCUS DEMIAN KIDNAPS CHILDREN Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us INFO FROM HAMOU’S CIVIL LAWSUIT AGAINST PALLASAT, ATCHISON & MOSHEIN:

http://www.omahamou.com/2nd%20Amended%20Counterclaim1.pdf

INVASION OF PRIVACY

[Excerpts] "...Hamou hereby incorporates herein by reference paragraphs 19 through 40 above. Defendants have intentionally and maliciously invaded the privacy of Hamou both by unauthorized disclosure and intrusion into the private life of Hamou in a manner that is of no legitimate interest to Defendants, much less the public, to whom they disclosed such information. Hamou does not intentionally disclose the location of her residence to the general public because her former husband, who is the subject of a restraining order issued by a Los Angeles court, has in the past physically beat and assaulted her and her child. The aforementioned ex-spouse has a well-documented history of persistent, violent attacks against Hamou and she makes every effort to restrict the public disclosure of her home address. With complete knowledge of this circumstance, having been fully informed of the danger involved, Defendants have posted Hamou’s address on the Pallasart’s website for no reason other than to invite the public to contact her at her home..."

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Hospital/Police/Court records indicate Oma Hamou was abused by Marcus Demian on multiple occasions.

Out of no where Marcus Demian appears on the scene and issues threats to Hamou. I think it is safe to say, if it had not been because of Bob Atchison, Rob Moshein & Pallasart this would have never happened:

May, 8, 2007 in a letter to Oma Hamou Marcus Demian writes:

[Excerpts] "...Oma you fucking whore...Your going down bitch for all the misery you have caused to people...You are less than a roach. It is time someone stepped on you and did what should have been done a long time ago...Put you in prison...You are going to hell... I hope you sleep fitfully...You know who this is..."

According to Mike Newson, in other communications Demian tells Hamou he is in contact with Hamou’s stalkers, that being Atchison/Moshein et.al.

Hamou's attorney summed up the motive behind Pallasart/Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein zeal towards her:
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket



$&

Photo Source: Internet Archives OmaHamou.com & Kidnapping Document provided by Mike Newson with permission by Oma Hamou.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

A thought....

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

I was going to write about my weekend trip to Idyllwild, but I have a very big Wednesday and no time right now. Instead, I'll leave you with something Mike Newson sent to APO by way of eMail:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us Perfection? No one that I know of has reached that stage, well excepting one person, the Messiah of Christian belief --- Jesus. And look at how his contemporaries treated him, let alone believed him! If the Internet had existed back then what would his enemy’s have done to him? When he was crucified they did not just figuratively do it like Oma Hamou has been crucified by her stalkers, and now her ex husband who has intruded on the scene lending his own distinct flavor to the mix.

In any case, there are skeletons buried in everyone’s closet. Not one of us can say that we are lily white, that we have never done something that we are not proud of. Does Oma have a checkered past?

Well according to the documentation dealing with her past she sure does, at the very least I think we can call her past colorful. I don’t see anywhere where she attempts to say that she is some goody two shoes girl from next door that is as pure as the driven snow. If anything she has been outspoken that she has made mistakes, stood up once more, attempted to rectify them and move on and up. If one looks at the life of many of the “greats” in history one finds all kinds of feet of clay and this continues right up to today as in President Clinton’s Monica situation.

What does all this have to do with Oma Hamou and her stalkers/vigilantes?

Well the odds are, in that they are human, that they are not without “sin” either, and yet they have thrown many stones at Oma. So how should we judge them?

What do we find in the way of motivation behind their actions toward Oma, not just Bob Atchison/Rob Moshein/Pallasart and the rest of that cult like group, but in the actions of her ex husband who recently said that he was in contact with Oma’s stalkers and then we find within minutes that the current Hate-Oma Blog --- that has nothing to do with Rob/Bob, et. al. and is not in communication with them at all --- knows all about it. I think if one examines the timing of the events you would have to conclude that the circumstances are such that one is forced to doubt the claims of non-involvement with Oma’s stalkers.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Looking at all the recent events one has to wonder, what would life have been like for Oma Hamou if she had never met her Ex Husband Marcus Demian (Herman Schloss and many other aliases) , and even more so -- Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison? One thing for sure, she would have a lot “duller” past and I doubt that everyone who is following the soap opera of her life would be doing so now.

Anyway, other than commenting on recent events, where am I going with this?

Well it seems that when one looks at a crime one first looks for motivation and opportunity. As to opportunity? Well if one is attempting to ruin someone’s reputation then we all have the opportunity now that the Internet sends our words to millions of people in an instant.

So let’s turn to motivation, firstly the new Hate-Oma Hamou site on BlogSpot that has “nothing” to do with Rob Moshein/Bob Atchison/Pallasart --- what is their motivation? What drives them to keep up the attack? Why is it their job to rid the world of Oma Hamou?

Answers to these questions are vital to understanding why they say what they say about Oma. Or more recently --- What drove Oma’s ex husband to do what he did way back when, and why the hostility today, why does he still need to discredit Oma? Given the number of women that he married, one can gather some reason for his initial interest in her, especially if you have seen photos from her early years (a wolf whistle would be appropriate here).

Knowing somewhat of Oma’s early years I can see how someone who had enticed ten women to marry him and who knows how many others may have been invited to his bed - before, during and after his marriage to Oma, well it is possible to understand how he added one more wife to the notches on his gun. Then having read the Montana State Register and the Montana Supreme Court ruling published here about Marcus --- well it is of no surprise that he attempted to destroy her reputation as well (and almost her life.) As if she were discredited - then one more witness to his actions was eliminated. Rob/Bob’s motivation in regard to the Alexander Palace and their obvious desire to control all that deals with it to a large extent allows us to understand some of their actions and this subject has been covered in vast detail previously. For the balance one has to dig deep into the psychology of the mind to understand what makes them do what they do.

The secret to understanding a person is in the motivation behind the actions. Sex, Greed and Power (control) seem to be the motivations behind Marcus and to a degree somewhat the same motivations could be said to apply to Rob/Bob albeit from a different direction. As to my motivation which I have stated many times in the past – well the story goes like this: I had recently met and photographed this woman named Oma and was in a situation such that I had some worries about another job she was asking me to do with regard to eventual recompense. I then discovered seeming evidence to justify my worries, but on further examination not being willing to accept a fact with out verification, I discovered inaccurate information being said about her and questioned it and instead was attacked myself as being Oma. One thing lead to another and instead of my leaving a situation where I was just doing a web design job, I was driven to find out why she was attacked such as she was, let alone why the vehement reaction to my simple comment of inaccuracy. The net result is a close friendship with a woman that I now admire for how she has stood up to the fires that have threatened to consume her.

Bottom line --- Bob/Rob turned me into her White Knight, forced me to discover the other side of the story and to defend Oma. And in turn I find the same weapons of libel and distortions of truth being wielded against my own person with as much devastation in emotional and physical well being, not to mention financial distress, as Oma has suffered, leaving me standing at the edge of personal ruin.

I am not defending her in terms of what she has done, as she has made as many mistakes as anyone I have ever heard of, if not more, but maybe because of those mistakes and the way she keeps standing back up and trying again and again with dogged determination to succeed. So the motivations behind me is the desire that right prevail, and an abhorrence of a bully attacking a woman --- contrast that to what the other side’s motivations appear to be.

Next comes the evidence. Notice that the evidence against Oma Hamou is constantly misinterpreted, not to mention that some of it was created to discredit her value as a witness. I’ve spent many, many, pages in the past picking apart the errors in interpretation, the outright lies, and the false conclusions. For instance notice that the Hate-Oma Blog along with “Herman” say that Oma was only married to him for three months, yet there has been published on the web the divorce decree that says that statement is a lie. (Who does that discredit? IS Herman/Marcus’s veracity immediately discredited? And in all honesty is not the report on that Hate-Oma Blog also discredited? Simply because they insist on maintaining as fact something which has been proven to be false.)

Still, most of what is claimed against Oma is in terms of having debt, and the majority of that happened because of events that can be directly traced back to the actions of Bob/Rob/Pallasart. Try reading up on most of the self made millionaires, and notice that on the average they declared bankruptcy eight times before “making it.” They, like Oma, just kept picking themselves back up “just one more time.”

One interesting thing is that on the Hate-Oma site they wonder about Oma’s usage of name in the divorce decree and yet a few lines latter show that she had not even married again and thus acquired the last name of Hamou. Is it not customary for a wife to take on the last name of her husband? So why is it that Oma having followed this custom is attacked as having done so?

As if this was one more reason to not believe her, to hate her.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Notice the new claims of having links to Oma Hamou in porn shots, and shudder (heaven forbid) “nude poses!” Yet just as in the past when Bob went to the police to report her they asked him if he had the evidence and he was forced to say no, but he was “working” on it, ---but it just had to be true. Well how hard is it to cut and paste a URL?

Either you have the URL or you don’t. If you don’t then you have never seen the evidence and are reporting a lie.

As to nude, well yes she has posed such that one can see her breasts, not to mention bare back and most of her cute behind. In fact I doubt that there is much of her which has not been seen by the camera - just as in any of the top models in this world. It is intriguing to notice the usage of Oma posed nude coupled with Oma did “whatever” to show that some how because of this she IS a horrible person whom you should hate and not believe, and yet when one looks at Rob/Bob’s history one finds many of the same things that they decry about her in their past, (well I don’t think they ever posed nude, but as to the rest of it…) does this not mean that we should judge them by the same standard that they claim Oma should be judged?

Could part of their motivation be that they have to destroy Oma’s creditability in order to protect their house of cards? Their grasp of ownership of control of all things Romanov?

No matter what I write or have written, those whose mind is closed to the possibilities that Rob/Bob, et. al. are not telling the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth will not comprehend what I have said, and those who believe Oma already and are her friends will just agree, but for those sitting on the fence, to you I suggest that there is reason to doubt the conclusions of those who would have you hate Oma, who have tried to discredit myself because I have championed her. Notice the motivation and emotional content of what “they” write about myself and Oma. Notice that they claim things that do not match up with reality, as in the words that Bob said in court that we have shown conflicted with his own sworn testimony. Let alone that the courts themselves show that what was claimed by Bob in court was true is not the truth. Does not that alone provide an element of doubt as to their basic believability? Notice how the courts have sided with Oma in regards to what “they” have said about her being potentially libelous. Notice how they “will” show you how Oma Hamou is a porn star, (as if this destroys her/our credibility) but have no proof, either they saw it and have the URL or they have not and are attempting to control your mind to induce hate and discredit her. Notice how they just say believe us. Yet when you look at the past words that have been written by myself and others, in Oma’s defense, we quoted documents that had been sworn to be true to the courts and then posted the entire document so you could tell if the quote had been taken out of context.

Truth is the best weapon in a battle such as this, it may not be a fast weapon, just as the truth did not keep Jesus from being crucified, but now look at it from a historical perspective… Truth will eventually win out, but in the mean time the power of a lie can kill.

Labels:

Saturday, May 19, 2007

A MESSAGE FOR BOB ATCHISON, ROB MOSHEIN & PALLASART WEB VENTURES, INC & IT'S SUBORDINATES

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us


&
You've been put on legal notice by way of eMail, US Mail and other communications that Oma Hamou intends to pursue criminal & civil litigation against you therefore if you destroy any evidence such as communications from anyone having to do with Hamou, Enigma or Sarskaia there will be legal ramifications.
Mike Newson of AA Legends Forum - August 2006

Thursday, May 10, 2007

The Teflon Cons

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

UPDATE

THE OMA HAMOU REALITY BLOG & IT'S CONNECTION TO BOB ATCHISON, ATCHISON'S WEB DESIGN COMPANY, PALLASART & ROB MOSHEIN ET.AL


POINT NUMBER #1: The Oma Hamou Reality Blog publishes an email which we are told was sent to Mike Newson from a "Patricia" (the "alleged" hitman's wife) who then forwards it to Rob Moshein. Both Edwards and Newson (from OmaHamou.com) have pointed out the email in question has never been published on the web or elsewhere. So how did the author who claims he/she is not in contact with Pallasart/Atchison et.al get it?

POINT NUMBER #2: In the past Bob Atchison claimed to friends, to the public, through his attorney and in court documents that he did not create the web site known as OMA HAMOU REPORT yet according to the police record from June of 2oo4 he states "HE" created it to warn others of Hamou's character.
So was he lying to the cops or lying to the court?

POINT NUMBER #3. Both Bob Atchison and Rob Moshein have proven themselves especially through court documentation as being dishonest men.

POINT NUMBER #4. According to Justin Edwards, Hamou receives an email from her ex-husband a Marcus Demian stamped dated "8, May 2007 22:08:24 -0700" stating:

"...I am in touch with the Stalkers as you quaintly put them...The bell of retribution is coming your way..."
POINT NUMBER #5: Most importantly, on *Thu Aug 10, 2006 6:10 pm (*authenticated*) Rob Moshein stated on the AA Legends Forum he knew the author of the OmaHamouReality blog and goes on to to say if Hamou wanted it deleted (gone) then all she had to do was have me (Sandman) delete mine.
And 'still' they expect us to believe they are not in contact with Rob Moshein, Bob Atchison or anyone else connected to Atchison's company.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Like others I’ve found the whole "Bob Atchison" story and the cult surrounding the last ruling family of Russia, Nicholas II fascinating. In an age of spin, Bob Atchison offers feeling and authenticity. His message and that of his company, Pallasart on Oma Hamou is consistent -- unshakeable, in fact, no matter the evidence -- he commands daily attention by his on-the-spot, invective-rich variations on the theme. His lunatic counterfactual art is more appealing than the banal awfulness of the reliable sources.

A simple Google search provides countless examples of absolutely horrifying cases where individuals have had their lives destroyed as a result of a psycho who lives to harass people on the Internet. It is absolutely reprehensible for someone to be able to come up with false, malicious and defamatory information about someone with the intent of destroying their character, and be able to do so with impunity and anonymity. In court documents both Rob Moshein and Bob Atchison claimed they had no idea if any of what they reported was true or not in regards to their libelous statements made about Oma Hamou. And who can blame them when they seem to have so much trouble deciphering their own life?

So again with all the lies, one understands it may be hard to keep track.

So, let's recap:

Bob Atchison won his lawsuit against Oma Hamou by lying and using forged documents --http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/11/updatedone-of-many-examples-of-forgery.html

Bob Atchison had "advantage" at trial Mike Newson says Oma Hamou wasn't represented by an attorney...

http://www.omahamou.com/pdf/Plaintiff_s_Reurged_Motion_for_Continuance.pdf

Bob Atchison & Cult "repeatedly" lie to law enforcement in an attempt to rid society of Hamou

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/bob-atchisons-plots-against-oma-hamou.html

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/11/cult-surrounding-alexander-palace-in.html

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2007/03/who-is-poster-who-calls-himself-tsarfan.html

Update: Pallasart/Bob Atchison & Rob Moshein's various web sites attracts the attention of Hamou's ex-Husband, a Marcus Demian who teams up with Pallasart/Bob Atchison et al. According to Justin Edwards, Demian has a history of violence and is purported to have not seen or spoken to Hamou in 17 years.

A Nancy Hart of New York City published excerpts from one of Demian's first eMails to Hamou was a threat which read:

"...Oma you fucking whore...Your going down bitch for all the misery you have caused to people...You are less than a roach. It is time someone stepped on you and did what should have been done a long time ago...Put you in prison...You are going to hell... I hope you sleep fitfully...You know who this is..."

Oma Hamou's Cease & Desist Letter to Pallasart, Bob Atchison,Rob Moshein & Watchtower OHR Blog:

http://www.omahamou.com/PDF/OmaHamouLetterBobAtchison81306.pdf

What is legitimate concerning Bob Atchison & Pallasart

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/what-is-legitimate-alexanderpalace.html

What has Bob Atchison done for the Alexander Palace? http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/10/in-ten-years-what-has-bob-atchison.html

The cult surrounding the Alexander Palace:

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/11/cult-surrounding-alexander-palace-in.html

Pallasart and the Art of Film making:

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/tonight-on-aa-legends-mike-newson_26.html

Those who Stalk:

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/those-who-stalkso-who-is-tonya-hoochie.html

Bob Atchison forgery and Perjury:

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/11/updatedone-of-many-examples-of-forgery.html

Rob Moshein's Legal pleadings:

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/found-this-according-to-mike-newson.html

The Following:

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/tonight-on-aa-legends-mike-newson.html

Did Enigma have real projects?

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/energy-summit-of-2003-and-enigma-films.html

Bob Atchison's murder for hire conspiracy: http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/bob-atchisons-plots-against-oma-hamou.html

It's all about credibility:

http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/credibility-is-key-question-here.html

Bob Atchison's allegedly admits wrong doing: http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/found-this-according-to-mike-newson.html

Mike Newson:

http://omahamourealityblogisafraudsite.blogspot.com/2006/12/just-who-is-mike-newson-blog.html

Pallasart "snubs" Hamou's Cease and Desist Letter: http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/08/bob-atchison-snubs-cease-desist-letter.html

The Oma Hamou versus Bob Atchison "War" http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/11/cult-surrounding-alexander-palace-in.html

Oma Hamou's comments about Atchison's perjury etc.: http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/09/has-oma-hamou-been-telling-truth.html

Read Bob Atchison's Oral Deposition in the Oma Hamou litigation: http://www.bobatchison.co.uk/Atchison11105.pdf or http://www.omahamou.com/PDF/Atchison11105.pdf

Court issues Restraining Order against Oma Hamou Report dot org: http://alexanderpalaceobsession.blogspot.com/2006/12/found-this-according-to-mike-newson.html

Read Hamou's Counterclaims against Atchison, Pallasart & Moshein

http://www.omahamou.com/2nd%20Amended%20Counterclaim1.pdf

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

Oma Hamou Reality Blog

On AA Legends another history forum about Anna Anderson & the Grand Duchess Anastasia Romanov, Rob Moshein published a statement he knew the author of the OmaHamouReality blog. He went on to say if Hamou wanted it deleted (gone) then all she had to do was have me (Sandman) delete mine.

I and others from the Legends forum decided to start this blog in part because Rob and his friends hijacked our forum and turned it into a place where they could daily stalk and harass Hamou and those who defended her.

I laugh when I read on that other blog (OmaHamouReality) that the author does not know Bob/Rob or Pallasart and is not in contact or associated with this group of people...yet Moshein himself told us he was.

Since Hamou's forum is offline and Legends is "no more" Mike Newson and other Hamou defenders have taken to make comments on the Alexander Palace Obsession blog about recent updates made on Oma Hamou Reality blog.

This is what Newson wrote today:

Justin (and everyone else that this applies to)

It matters not who the person(s) is who is/are publishing that Hate-Oma, and those around her, blog. The point is that they have been notified that their blog is libelous and that it is causing harm. Oma and I have both published letters correcting their inaccuracies and formally requested them to cease and desist. They will simply join in the group of other Hate-Oma defendants when this does go back to court. As financial loss is involved they will along with Bob Atchison / Pallasart, et. al. enjoy the court’s attention and suffer the same judgment and punishment, so why worry about who it is, as when the time is ripe all will be revealed.

I know the emotional trauma that you have undergone as well as the financial that we have all suffered because of what Bob did and what he has caused others to do. The Yin and Yang of the universe will eventually have to balance. So for right now I don’t worry about who they are. But as for their diatribes against Oma, and us (as there does seem to be this undercurrent of any one who defends Oma must be Oma…) are the same as in the past, why even give them the credence of reacting to them.

I have previoulsy taken the time to point by point take apart and debunk each and every point that Rob/Bob/Pallasart as well as the publishers of the current Hate-Oma Blog have published about Oma and myself. Rob/Bob both at one point were willing to say in print that everything they said about Oma was false and retract what they had said.

So I see no need to do that again, the point is that all of these people have been put on notice that their activities are causing harm: emotionally, physically, financially… Both Oma and I now have to point out daily that we have stalkers, so jobs are hard to come by, and we are forced almost daily defend ourselves to total strangers from these accusation.

Now as to the publishers of the current Hate-Oma-Group Blog continued decrying that they are not Rob or Bob or connected to or communicating with them, well if you (the reader) are serious then do some comparison of writing styles and words used such as; “kiddies”, “Miss Wannabee Never Was Thang”, notice especially the “Thang” word. Or their decleration of “We are NOT "Pallasart". We are NOT any single person they say we are. We are NOT in contact with nor in any way affiliated with any of them either.” Now compare that with the OmaHamouReports decleration of “This website is the private property of the author/domain owner, and was researched, written and built by no one else. Despite Hamou's claims, Robert Atchison has no involvment whatsoever with this content.” And yet in Bob’s communications with the police he claimed ownership of the site content. Also notice that on Legends that Rob admitted that he knew the author as he could get the Hate-Oma Blog taken down, and now they say they have no contact with Rob/Bob/Pallasart… Next notice that they published eMail’s that had not been published previously, and as “we” certainly did not provide them with the letterthat the question comes up in --- how did they get it?

I asked Oma about this and she replied:

Mike,

The letters which you or Justin have put up on the web have either been published on the web from the onset of my litigation with Bob/Rob with my then attorney's knowledge and/or were made a part of the official court record in pleadings by my then attorney. No one has published Patricia's letter to you which she forwarded to Rob and its unlikely that the person who created the blog about me paid hundreds of dollars to obtain the court record. With that in mind, I think the court would have a record of who came and got a copy of the file or parts thereof?

Oma

I’ll leave it to the reader to make up their own minds as to if the material published by Watchtower on those Blogs is harmful to Oma, myself, or anyone associated with Oma. It is instructive to look at the concept of “motive.” What motive does the publisher of those blogs have? Why would they keep doing what they do, why spend time reading what Sandman compiles from the Web, and then responding to things about Rob/Bob/Pallasart????? What is the motive? Why do they hate Oma and all associated with her?

Why do they ask the exact same questions? Why is there the similarity of words as used in the past (kiddies and Thang?) Why are the writing styles similar? Why do they say the exact same things as have been previously published and defacto admitted to by Rob/Bob as false and misleading by their willingness to negotiate a retraction with Oma’s Lawyer, and yet in spite of that and the knowledge that the courts did not find what they had published to be innocuous they resumed their destructive behaviors?

Taken one point at a time it means nothing, but statically, based on the overwhelming similarities, the concept that the present authors have no connections at all with the previous authors that have held up the Hate-Oma-Group banner is honestly ludicrous.

Bottom line is --- Why?

What is their motivation?

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Labels: , , ,